FKIE_CVE-2024-8669

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-09-14 04:15 - Updated: 2024-09-27 16:08
Severity ?
9.1 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
7.2 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
The Backuply – Backup, Restore, Migrate and Clone plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'options' parameter passed to the backuply_wp_clone_sql() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.4 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/backuply/trunk/functions.php#L1477Product
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3151205/Patch
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/6a061553-c988-4a31-a0a2-7a2608faa33f?source=cveThird Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
softaculous backuply *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:softaculous:backuply:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "764255AD-4EC1-4B3A-AD53-60DB53432BA5",
              "versionEndExcluding": "1.3.5",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Backuply \u2013 Backup, Restore, Migrate and Clone plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the \u0027options\u0027 parameter passed to the backuply_wp_clone_sql() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.4 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query.  This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento Backuply \u2013 Backup, Restore, Migrate and Clone para WordPress es vulnerable a la inyecci\u00f3n SQL a trav\u00e9s del par\u00e1metro \u0027options\u0027 que se pasa a la funci\u00f3n backuply_wp_clone_sql() en todas las versiones hasta la 1.3.4 incluida, debido a un escape insuficiente en el par\u00e1metro proporcionado por el usuario y a la falta de preparaci\u00f3n suficiente en la consulta SQL existente. Esto permite que atacantes autenticados, con acceso de nivel de administrador o superior, agreguen consultas SQL adicionales a las consultas ya existentes que se pueden usar para extraer informaci\u00f3n confidencial de la base de datos."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-8669",
  "lastModified": "2024-09-27T16:08:15.487",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.1,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
        "impactScore": 6.0,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.2,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-09-14T04:15:04.963",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/backuply/trunk/functions.php#L1477"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3151205/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/6a061553-c988-4a31-a0a2-7a2608faa33f?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-89"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.