fkie_cve-2025-1247
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-02-13 14:16
Modified
2025-03-03 14:15
Severity ?
8.3 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Summary
A flaw was found in Quarkus REST that allows request parameters to leak between concurrent requests if endpoints use field injection without a CDI scope. This vulnerability allows attackers to manipulate request data, impersonate users, or access sensitive information.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1884
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1885
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2067
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1247
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2345172
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "A flaw was found in Quarkus REST that allows request parameters to leak between concurrent requests if endpoints use field injection without a CDI scope. This vulnerability allows attackers to manipulate request data, impersonate users, or access sensitive information.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Se encontró una falla en Quarkus REST que permite que los parámetros de solicitud se filtren entre solicitudes concurrentes si los endpoints usan la inyección de campos sin un alcance CDI. Esta vulnerabilidad permite a los atacantes manipular los datos de la solicitud, hacerse pasar por usuarios o acceder a información confidencial.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2025-1247",
   lastModified: "2025-03-03T14:15:34.120",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "LOW",
               baseScore: 8.3,
               baseSeverity: "HIGH",
               confidentialityImpact: "HIGH",
               integrityImpact: "HIGH",
               privilegesRequired: "LOW",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 2.8,
            impactScore: 5.5,
            source: "secalert@redhat.com",
            type: "Secondary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2025-02-13T14:16:18.400",
   references: [
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1884",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1885",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2067",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1247",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2345172",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-488",
            },
         ],
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         type: "Secondary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.