FKIE_CVE-2025-14317

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-14 14:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:35
Summary
In Crazy Bubble Tea mobile application authenticated attacker can obtain personal information about other users by enumerating a `loyaltyGuestId` parameter. Server does not verify the permissions required to obtain the data. This issue was fixed in version 915 (Android) and 7.4.1 (iOS).
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "Android"
          ],
          "product": "Crazy Bubble Tea",
          "vendor": "Emaintenance",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "915",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "iOS"
          ],
          "product": "Crazy Bubble Tea",
          "vendor": "Emaintenance",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.4.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cvd@cert.pl"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In Crazy Bubble Tea mobile application authenticated attacker can\u00a0obtain personal information about other users by enumerating a `loyaltyGuestId` parameter. Server\u00a0does not verify the permissions required to obtain the data.\n\n\nThis issue was fixed in version\u00a0915 (Android) and 7.4.1 (iOS)."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En la aplicaci\u00f3n m\u00f3vil Crazy Bubble Tea, un atacante autenticado puede obtener informaci\u00f3n personal sobre otros usuarios al enumerar un par\u00e1metro \u0027loyaltyGuestId\u0027. El servidor no verifica los permisos necesarios para obtener los datos.\n\nEste problema se solucion\u00f3 en la versi\u00f3n 915 (Android) y 7.4.1 (iOS)."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-14317",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:35:43.480",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "NONE",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 7.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "cvd@cert.pl",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-14317",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-01-14T13:56:54.473704Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-01-14T14:16:11.543",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cvd@cert.pl",
      "url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/01/CVE-2025-14317"
    },
    {
      "source": "cvd@cert.pl",
      "url": "https://crazybubble.pl/aplikacja-crazy-bubble/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cvd@cert.pl",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-359"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cvd@cert.pl",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…