FKIE_CVE-2025-15482

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-04 09:15 - Updated: 2026-04-15 00:35
Severity
5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Summary
The Chapa Payment Gateway Plugin for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3 via 'chapa_proceed' WooCommerce API endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including the merchant's Chapa secret API key.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/chapa-payment-gateway-for-woocommerce/tags/1.0.3/includes/class-waf-wc-chapa-gateway.php#L418
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/190492ec-5982-4dce-9e97-16a518a01a27?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Chapa Payment Gateway Plugin for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3 via \u0027chapa_proceed\u0027 WooCommerce API endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including the merchant\u0027s Chapa secret API key."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin Chapa Payment Gateway para WooCommerce plugin para WordPress es vulnerable a la Exposici\u00f3n de Informaci\u00f3n Sensible en todas las versiones hasta la 1.0.3, inclusive, a trav\u00e9s del endpoint de la API de WooCommerce \u0027chapa_proceed\u0027. Esto posibilita que atacantes no autenticados extraigan datos sensibles, incluyendo la clave secreta de la API de Chapa del comerciante."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-15482",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-15T00:35:42.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-02-04T09:15:51.033",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/chapa-payment-gateway-for-woocommerce/tags/1.0.3/includes/class-waf-wc-chapa-gateway.php#L418"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/190492ec-5982-4dce-9e97-16a518a01a27?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-200"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.