FKIE_CVE-2025-1634

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-02-26 17:15 - Updated: 2025-08-01 19:15
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
A flaw was found in the quarkus-resteasy extension, which causes memory leaks when client requests with low timeouts are made. If a client request times out, a buffer is not released correctly, leading to increased memory usage and eventual application crash due to OutOfMemoryError.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:12511
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1884
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1885
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2067
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9922
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1634
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2347319
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A flaw was found in the quarkus-resteasy extension, which causes memory leaks when client requests with low timeouts are made. If a client request times out, a buffer is not released correctly, leading to increased memory usage and eventual application crash due to OutOfMemoryError."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se ha encontrado un error en la extensi\u00f3n quarkus-resteasy, que ocasiona p\u00e9rdidas de memoria cuando los clientes efect\u00faan peticiones con timeouts bajos. Si la petici\u00f3n de un cliente caduca, no se libera correctamente un buffer, lo que ocasiona un mayor uso de memoria y una eventual finalizaci\u00f3n de la aplicaci\u00f3n debido a un OutOfMemoryError."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-1634",
  "lastModified": "2025-08-01T19:15:32.940",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-02-26T17:15:22.083",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:12511"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1884"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1885"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:2067"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9922"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1634"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2347319"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-401"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.