FKIE_CVE-2025-1705

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-03-28 09:15 - Updated: 2025-03-28 18:11
Severity ?
6.1 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
The tagDiv Composer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation within the td_ajax_get_views AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://tagdiv.com/newspaper-changelog/
security@wordfence.comhttps://tagdiv.com/tagdiv-composer-page-builder-basics/
security@wordfence.comhttps://themeforest.net/item/newspaper/5489609
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2aaa8c34-cf7b-4630-adc8-cbb534deff89?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The tagDiv Composer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation within the td_ajax_get_views AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento tagDiv Composer para WordPress es vulnerable a Cross-Site Request Forgery en todas las versiones hasta la 5.3 incluida. Esto se debe a la falta o a una validaci\u00f3n incorrecta de nonce en la acci\u00f3n AJAX td_ajax_get_views. Esto permite que atacantes no autenticados inyecten scripts web maliciosos mediante una solicitud falsificada, ya que pueden enga\u00f1ar al administrador del sitio para que realice una acci\u00f3n como hacer clic en un enlace."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-1705",
  "lastModified": "2025-03-28T18:11:40.180",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.1,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 2.7,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-03-28T09:15:13.917",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://tagdiv.com/newspaper-changelog/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://tagdiv.com/tagdiv-composer-page-builder-basics/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://themeforest.net/item/newspaper/5489609"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2aaa8c34-cf7b-4630-adc8-cbb534deff89?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-79"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.