FKIE_CVE-2025-1713

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-07-17 14:15 - Updated: 2025-07-17 21:15
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices, including PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required. This lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context where acquiring that lock is unsafe. This can lead to a deadlock.
References
security@xen.orghttps://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-467.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/1
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/3
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/28/1
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-467.html
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices,\nincluding PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required.\nThis lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context\nwhere acquiring that lock is unsafe.  This can lead to a deadlock."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Al configurar la reasignaci\u00f3n de interrupciones para dispositivos PCI(-X) antiguos, incluidos los puentes PCI(-X), se requiere una b\u00fasqueda del puente ascendente. Esta b\u00fasqueda, que implica la adquisici\u00f3n de un bloqueo, se realiza en un contexto donde la adquisici\u00f3n de dicho bloqueo no es segura. Esto puede provocar un interbloqueo."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-1713",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-17T21:15:50.197",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-17T14:15:30.527",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@xen.org",
      "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/3"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/28/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@xen.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-833"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.