FKIE_CVE-2025-21597

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-09 20:15 - Updated: 2025-04-11 15:40
Summary
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, logically adjacent BGP peer to cause Denial of Service (DoS). On all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved platforms, when BGP rib-sharding and update-threading are configured, and a BGP peer flap is done with specific timing, rpd crashes and restarts. Continuous peer flapping at specific time intervals will result in a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects eBGP and iBGP, in both IPv4 and IPv6 implementations. This issue requires a remote attacker to have at least one established BGP session. The issue can occur with or without logical-systems enabled. This issue affects: Junos OS: * All versions before 20.4R3-S8, * 21.2 versions before 21.2R3-S6, * 21.3 versions before 21.3R3-S5, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S4, * 22.1 versions before 22.1R3-S3, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S1, * 22.3 versions before 22.3R3, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3. Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.2R3-S6-EVO, * 21.3-EVO versions before 21.3R3-S5-EVO, * 21.4-EVO versions before 21.4R3-S4-EVO, * 22.1-EVO versions before 22.1R3-S3-EVO, * 22.2-EVO versions before :22.2R3-S1-EVO, * 22.3-EVO versions before 22.3R3-EVO, * 22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R3-EVO.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, logically adjacent BGP peer to cause Denial of Service (DoS).\n\nOn all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved platforms, when BGP rib-sharding and update-threading are configured, and a BGP peer flap is done with specific timing, rpd crashes and restarts. Continuous peer flapping at specific time intervals will result in a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.\n\nThis issue affects eBGP and iBGP, in both IPv4 and IPv6 implementations.  This issue requires a remote attacker to have at least one established BGP session. The issue can occur with or without logical-systems enabled.\n\nThis issue affects:\nJunos OS:\n\n\n\n  *  All versions before 20.4R3-S8,\n  *  21.2 versions before 21.2R3-S6,\n\n  *  21.3 versions before 21.3R3-S5,\n  *  21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S4,\n  *  22.1 versions before 22.1R3-S3,\n  *  22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S1,\n  *  22.3 versions before 22.3R3,\n  *  22.4 versions before 22.4R3.\n\n\nJunos OS Evolved:\n\n\n\n  *  All versions before 21.2R3-S6-EVO,\n  *  21.3-EVO versions before 21.3R3-S5-EVO,\n  *  21.4-EVO versions before 21.4R3-S4-EVO,\n  *  22.1-EVO versions before 22.1R3-S3-EVO,\n  *  22.2-EVO versions before :22.2R3-S1-EVO,\n  *  22.3-EVO versions before 22.3R3-EVO,\n  *  22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R3-EVO."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad de Comprobaci\u00f3n Incorrecta de Condiciones Inusuales o Excepcionales en el demonio de protocolo de enrutamiento (rpd) de Juniper Networks Junos OS y Junos OS Evolved permite que un par BGP no autenticado y l\u00f3gicamente adyacente provoque una Denegaci\u00f3n de Servicio (DoS). En todas las plataformas Junos OS y Junos OS Evolved, cuando se configuran la fragmentaci\u00f3n de BGP y los subprocesos de actualizaci\u00f3n, y se produce una inestabilidad entre pares BGP con una temporizaci\u00f3n espec\u00edfica, el rpd se bloquea y se reinicia. La inestabilidad continua entre pares a intervalos espec\u00edficos provocar\u00e1 una Denegaci\u00f3n de Servicio (DoS) sostenida. Este problema afecta a eBGP e iBGP, tanto en implementaciones de IPv4 como de IPv6. Requiere que un atacante remoto tenga al menos una sesi\u00f3n BGP establecida. El problema puede ocurrir con o sin sistemas l\u00f3gicos habilitados. Este problema afecta a: Junos OS: * Todas las versiones anteriores a 20.4R3-S8, * Versiones 21.2 anteriores a 21.2R3-S6, * Versiones 21.3 anteriores a 21.3R3-S5, * Versiones 21.4 anteriores a 21.4R3-S4, * Versiones 22.1 anteriores a 22.1R3-S3, * Versiones 22.2 anteriores a 22.2R3-S1, * Versiones 22.3 anteriores a 22.3R3, * Versiones 22.4 anteriores a 22.4R3. Junos OS Evolved: * Todas las versiones anteriores a 21.2R3-S6-EVO, * Versiones 21.3-EVO anteriores a 21.3R3-S5-EVO, * Versiones 21.4-EVO anteriores a 21.4R3-S4-EVO, * Versiones 22.1-EVO anteriores a 22.1R3-S3-EVO, * Versiones 22.2-EVO anteriores a 22.2R3-S1-EVO, * Versiones 22.3-EVO anteriores a 22.3R3-EVO, * Versiones 22.4-EVO anteriores a 22.4R3-EVO."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-21597",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-11T15:40:10.277",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "sirt@juniper.net",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "AUTOMATIC",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
          "attackVector": "ADJACENT",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 6.0,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:A/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "sirt@juniper.net",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-04-09T20:15:26.100",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "sirt@juniper.net",
      "url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA96451"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "sirt@juniper.net",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-754"
        }
      ],
      "source": "sirt@juniper.net",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…