fkie_cve-2025-23367
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-30 15:15
Modified
2025-04-01 14:15
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
A flaw was found in the Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider. When authorization to control management operations is secured using the Role Based Access Control provider, a user without the required privileges can suspend or resume the server. A user with a Monitor or Auditor role is supposed to have only read access permissions and should not be able to suspend the server. The vulnerability is caused by the Suspend and Resume handlers not performing authorization checks to validate whether the current user has the required permissions to proceed with the action.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3465
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3467
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23367
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337620
secalert@redhat.comhttps://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qr6x-62gq-4ccp
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "A flaw was found in the Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider. When authorization to control management operations is secured using the Role Based Access Control provider, a user without the required privileges can suspend or resume the server. A user with a Monitor or Auditor role is supposed to have only read access permissions and should not be able to suspend the server. \nThe vulnerability is caused by the Suspend and Resume handlers not performing authorization checks to validate whether the current user has the required permissions to proceed with the action.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Se encontró una falla en el proveedor Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC). Cuando la autorización para controlar las operaciones de administración se asegura mediante el proveedor de control de acceso basado en roles, un usuario sin los privilegios requeridos puede suspender o reanudar el servidor. Se supone que un usuario con un rol de Monitor o Auditor solo tiene permisos de acceso de lectura y no debería poder suspender el servidor. La vulnerabilidad se debe a que los controladores de Suspensión y Reanudación no realizan comprobaciones de autorización para validar si el usuario actual tiene los permisos requeridos para continuar con la acción.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2025-23367",
   lastModified: "2025-04-01T14:15:22.157",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 6.5,
               baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "LOW",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 2.8,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "secalert@redhat.com",
            type: "Secondary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2025-01-30T15:15:18.610",
   references: [
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3465",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3467",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23367",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337620",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qr6x-62gq-4ccp",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-284",
            },
         ],
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         type: "Secondary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.