FKIE_CVE-2025-25069
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-02-07 13:15 - Updated: 2025-07-16 14:47
Severity ?
Summary
A Cross-Protocol Scripting vulnerability is found in Apache Kvrocks.
Since Kvrocks didn't detect if "Host:" or "POST" appears in RESP requests,
a valid HTTP request can also be sent to Kvrocks as a valid RESP request
and trigger some database operations, which can be dangerous when
it is chained with SSRF.
It is similiar to CVE-2016-10517 in Redis.
This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from the initial version to the latest version 2.11.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.11.1, which fixes the issue.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread/gbxv9gpsskmdzg6z48zm3tvo8cyo9v3t | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
| security@apache.org | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10517 | Not Applicable |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:kvrocks:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FA3F1E1E-0969-477C-A732-BC37943EDFE6",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.11.1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A Cross-Protocol Scripting vulnerability is found in Apache Kvrocks.\n\nSince Kvrocks didn\u0027t detect if \"Host:\" or \"POST\" appears in RESP requests,\na valid HTTP request can also be sent to Kvrocks as a valid RESP request \nand trigger some database operations, which can be\u00a0dangerous when \nit is chained with SSRF.\n\nIt is similiar to\u00a0CVE-2016-10517 in Redis.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from the initial version to the latest version 2.11.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.11.1, which fixes the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se ha detectado una vulnerabilidad de Cross-Protocol Scripting en Apache Kvrocks. Dado que Kvrocks no detecta si aparece \"Host:\" o \"POST\" en las solicitudes RESP, tambi\u00e9n se puede enviar una solicitud HTTP v\u00e1lida a Kvrocks como una solicitud RESP v\u00e1lida y activar algunas operaciones de base de datos, lo que puede ser peligroso cuando se encadena con SSRF. Es similar a CVE-2016-10517 en Redis. Este problema afecta a Apache Kvrocks: desde la versi\u00f3n inicial hasta la \u00faltima versi\u00f3n 2.11.0. Se recomienda a los usuarios que actualicen a la versi\u00f3n 2.11.1, que soluciona el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-25069",
"lastModified": "2025-07-16T14:47:38.310",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 2.5,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-02-07T13:15:32.170",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/gbxv9gpsskmdzg6z48zm3tvo8cyo9v3t"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Not Applicable"
],
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10517"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-115"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…