FKIE_CVE-2025-25827

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-02-26 15:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:01
Severity
6.8 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Summary
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the component sort.php of Emlog Pro v2.5.4 allows attackers to scan local and internal ports via supplying a crafted URL.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://emlogpro.comNot Applicable
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/Ka7arotto/emlog/blob/main/ssrf.mdBroken Link
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.emlog.net/Product
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
emlog emlog 2.5.4
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emlog:emlog:2.5.4:*:*:*:pro:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B4C6E87D-4100-45E1-8692-0D255C04165B",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the component sort.php of Emlog Pro v2.5.4 allows attackers to scan local and internal ports via supplying a crafted URL."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) en el componente sort.php de Emlog Pro v2.5.4 permite a los atacantes escanear puertos locales e internos mediante el suministro de una URL manipulada."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-25827",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:01:14.587",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.8,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.5,
        "impactScore": 4.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-25827",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "poc"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-03-06T20:31:15.751997Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-02-26T15:15:28.747",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Not Applicable"
      ],
      "url": "http://emlogpro.com"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Broken Link"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/Ka7arotto/emlog/blob/main/ssrf.md"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.emlog.net/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-918"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.