FKIE_CVE-2025-27432

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-03-11 01:15 - Updated: 2025-03-11 01:15
Summary
The eDocument Cockpit (Inbound NF-e) in SAP Electronic Invoicing for Brazil allows an authenticated attacker with certain privileges to gain unauthorized access to each transaction. By executing the specific ABAP method within the ABAP system, an unauthorized attacker could call each transaction and view the inbound delivery details. This vulnerability has a low impact on the confidentiality with no effect on the integrity and the availability of the application.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The eDocument Cockpit (Inbound NF-e) in SAP Electronic Invoicing for Brazil allows an authenticated attacker with certain privileges to gain unauthorized access to each transaction. By executing the specific ABAP method within the ABAP system, an unauthorized attacker could call each transaction and view the inbound delivery details. This vulnerability has a low impact on the confidentiality with no effect on the integrity and the availability of the application."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El eDocument Cockpit (Inbound NF-e) en la facturaci\u00f3n electr\u00f3nica de SAP para Brasil permite que un atacante autenticado con ciertos privilegios obtenga acceso no autorizado a cada transacci\u00f3n. Al ejecutar el m\u00e9todo ABAP espec\u00edfico dentro del sistema ABAP, un atacante no autorizado podr\u00eda llamar a cada transacci\u00f3n y ver los detalles de la entrega entrante. Esta vulnerabilidad tiene un impacto bajo en la confidencialidad y no afecta la integridad ni la disponibilidad de la aplicaci\u00f3n."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-27432",
  "lastModified": "2025-03-11T01:15:36.467",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 2.4,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 0.9,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "cna@sap.com",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-03-11T01:15:36.467",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3568865"
    },
    {
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cna@sap.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…