FKIE_CVE-2025-27446

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-07-06 06:15 - Updated: 2025-11-04 22:16
Summary
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Apache APISIX(java-plugin-runner). Local listening file permissions in APISIX plugin runner allow a local attacker to elevate privileges. This issue affects Apache APISIX(java-plugin-runner): from 0.2.0 through 0.5.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.6.0 or higher, which fixes the issue.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
apache apisix *

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "76C83102-5D42-465F-8566-42240DAA3D35",
              "versionEndIncluding": "0.5",
              "versionStartIncluding": "0.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Apache APISIX(java-plugin-runner).\n\nLocal listening file permissions in APISIX plugin runner allow a local attacker to elevate privileges.\nThis issue affects Apache APISIX(java-plugin-runner): from 0.2.0 through 0.5.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.6.0 or higher, which fixes the issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad de asignaci\u00f3n incorrecta de permisos para recursos cr\u00edticos en Apache APISIX(java-plugin-runner). Los permisos de los archivos de escucha locales en el ejecutor de complementos de APISIX permiten a un atacante local elevar privilegios. Este problema afecta a Apache APISIX(java-plugin-runner): de la 0.2.0 a la 0.5.0. Se recomienda actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 0.6.0 o superior, que soluciona el problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-27446",
  "lastModified": "2025-11-04T22:16:08.380",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-06T06:15:21.587",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/qwxnxolt0j5nvjfpr0mlz6h7nrtvyzng"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/07/06/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/07/07/1"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-732"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…