FKIE_CVE-2025-30473

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-07 09:15 - Updated: 2025-04-11 12:59
Severity ?
8.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider. When using the partition clause in SQLTableCheckOperator as parameter (which was a recommended pattern), Authenticated UI User could inject arbitrary SQL command when triggering DAG exposing partition_clause to the user. This allowed the DAG Triggering user to escalate privileges to execute those arbitrary commands which they normally would not have. This issue affects Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: before 1.24.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.24.1, which fixes the issue.
References
security@apache.orghttps://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48098Issue Tracking, Patch
security@apache.orghttps://lists.apache.org/thread/53klkv790cylqcop0350w7nfq1y6h0t2Mailing List, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/04/2Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/1Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/2Mailing List
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/3Mailing List
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
apache airflow_common_sql_provider *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:airflow_common_sql_provider:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E1C538E3-3A53-4DE7-9ABD-F7293C046752",
              "versionEndExcluding": "1.24.1",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider.\n\nWhen using the partition clause in SQLTableCheckOperator as parameter (which was a recommended pattern), Authenticated UI User could inject arbitrary SQL command when triggering DAG exposing partition_clause to the user.\nThis allowed the DAG Triggering user to escalate privileges to execute those arbitrary commands which they normally would not have.\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: before 1.24.1.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.24.1, which fixes the issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad de neutralizaci\u00f3n incorrecta de elementos especiales utilizados en una vulnerabilidad de comando SQL (\u0027Inyecci\u00f3n SQL\u0027) en el proveedor SQL com\u00fan de Apache Airflow. Al usar la cl\u00e1usula de partici\u00f3n en SQLTableCheckOperator como par\u00e1metro (un patr\u00f3n recomendado), el usuario autenticado de la interfaz de usuario pod\u00eda inyectar un comando SQL arbitrario al activar el DAG, exponiendo la cl\u00e1usula de partici\u00f3n al usuario. Esto permit\u00eda al usuario que activaba el DAG escalar privilegios para ejecutar dichos comandos arbitrarios, algo que normalmente no tendr\u00eda. Este problema afecta al proveedor SQL com\u00fan de Apache Airflow: versiones anteriores a la 1.24.1. Se recomienda actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 1.24.1, que soluciona el problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-30473",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-11T12:59:03.450",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-04-07T09:15:16.667",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48098"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/53klkv790cylqcop0350w7nfq1y6h0t2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/04/2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/3"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-89"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.