FKIE_CVE-2025-38723
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-09-04 16:15 - Updated: 2026-01-08 17:42
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Fix jump offset calculation in tailcall
The extra pass of bpf_int_jit_compile() skips JIT context initialization
which essentially skips offset calculation leaving out_offset = -1, so
the jmp_offset in emit_bpf_tail_call is calculated by
"#define jmp_offset (out_offset - (cur_offset))"
is a negative number, which is wrong. The final generated assembly are
as follow.
54: bgeu $a2, $t1, -8 # 0x0000004c
58: addi.d $a6, $s5, -1
5c: bltz $a6, -16 # 0x0000004c
60: alsl.d $t2, $a2, $a1, 0x3
64: ld.d $t2, $t2, 264
68: beq $t2, $zero, -28 # 0x0000004c
Before apply this patch, the follow test case will reveal soft lock issues.
cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
./test_progs --allow=tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_1
dmesg:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 26s! [test_progs:25056]
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| debian | debian_linux | 11.0 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0C9B5F1A-9644-4E1A-B1E8-A0A2EE50EFC1",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.149",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F2293654-7169-49B5-8D0D-EE51EF8B8E48",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.103",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "472C5F87-2BF3-4FAB-9B21-DA7513977363",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.43",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "BC242347-F722-43AE-B910-BE0B22386977",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.15.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "BD7C087D-2415-4521-B624-30003352F899",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.16.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.16",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FA6FEEC2-9F11-4643-8827-749718254FED",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Fix jump offset calculation in tailcall\n\nThe extra pass of bpf_int_jit_compile() skips JIT context initialization\nwhich essentially skips offset calculation leaving out_offset = -1, so\nthe jmp_offset in emit_bpf_tail_call is calculated by\n\n\"#define jmp_offset (out_offset - (cur_offset))\"\n\nis a negative number, which is wrong. The final generated assembly are\nas follow.\n\n54:\tbgeu \t$a2, $t1, -8\t # 0x0000004c\n58:\taddi.d \t$a6, $s5, -1\n5c:\tbltz \t$a6, -16\t # 0x0000004c\n60:\talsl.d \t$t2, $a2, $a1, 0x3\n64:\tld.d \t$t2, $t2, 264\n68:\tbeq \t$t2, $zero, -28\t # 0x0000004c\n\nBefore apply this patch, the follow test case will reveal soft lock issues.\n\ncd tools/testing/selftests/bpf/\n./test_progs --allow=tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_1\n\ndmesg:\nwatchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 26s! [test_progs:25056]"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-38723",
"lastModified": "2026-01-08T17:42:36.560",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-09-04T16:15:42.130",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/17c010fe45def335fe03a0718935416b04c7f349"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a782fa32e644aa9fbae6c8488f3e61221ac96e1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9262e3e04621558e875eb5afb5e726b648cd5949"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd39d9e6b7e4c58fa77783e7aedf7ada51d02ea3"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2b5e50cc04d7a049b385bc1c93b9cbf5f10c94f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f83d469e16bb1f75991ca67c56786fb2aaa42bea"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…