FKIE_CVE-2025-48735

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-05-23 20:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:30
Severity
4.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Summary
A SQL Injection issue in the request body processing in BOS IPCs with firmware 21.45.8.2.2_220219 before 21.45.8.2.3_230220 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from the database via crafted input in the request body.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://bositaly.it/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CAMERA-VULNERABILITY-REPORT-SQL-INJECTION.pdf
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "IP camera",
          "vendor": "BOS",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "21.45.8.2.3_230220",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "21.45.8.2.2_220219",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A SQL Injection issue in the request body processing in BOS IPCs with firmware 21.45.8.2.2_220219 before 21.45.8.2.3_230220 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from the database via crafted input in the request body."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Un problema de inyecci\u00f3n SQL en el procesamiento del cuerpo de la solicitud en los IPC BOS con firmware 21.45.8.2.2_220219 anterior a 21.45.8.2.3_230220 permite a atacantes remotos obtener informaci\u00f3n confidencial de la base de datos a trav\u00e9s de una entrada manipulada en el cuerpo de la solicitud."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-48735",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:30:14.970",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "cve@mitre.org",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-48735",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-05-23T21:17:06.051927Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-05-23T20:15:25.033",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://bositaly.it/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CAMERA-VULNERABILITY-REPORT-SQL-INJECTION.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-89"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.