FKIE_CVE-2025-50428

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-08-27 17:15 - Updated: 2025-09-09 18:45
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In RaspAP raspap-webgui 3.3.2 and earlier, a command injection vulnerability exists in the includes/hostapd.php script. The vulnerability is due to improper sanitizing of user input passed via the interface parameter.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://blog.smarttecs.com/posts/2025-004-cve-2025-50428/Exploit, Third Party Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/RaspAP/raspap-webgui/pull/1833Issue Tracking, Patch
134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0https://blog.smarttecs.com/posts/2025-004-cve-2025-50428/Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
raspap raspap-webgui *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:raspap:raspap-webgui:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6848F706-8C80-4771-BD48-AEC8D8F8581C",
              "versionEndIncluding": "3.3.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In RaspAP raspap-webgui 3.3.2 and earlier, a command injection vulnerability exists in the includes/hostapd.php script. The vulnerability is due to improper sanitizing of user input passed via the interface parameter."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En RaspAP raspap-webgui 3.3.2 y versiones anteriores, existe una vulnerabilidad de inyecci\u00f3n de comandos en el script \"includes/hostapd.php\". Esta vulnerabilidad se debe a una depuraci\u00f3n incorrecta de la entrada del usuario enviada a trav\u00e9s del par\u00e1metro de interfaz."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-50428",
  "lastModified": "2025-09-09T18:45:52.470",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-08-27T17:15:41.443",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://blog.smarttecs.com/posts/2025-004-cve-2025-50428/"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/RaspAP/raspap-webgui/pull/1833"
    },
    {
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://blog.smarttecs.com/posts/2025-004-cve-2025-50428/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-77"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.