FKIE_CVE-2025-55129
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-02 02:15 - Updated: 2025-12-02 19:15
Severity ?
Summary
HackerOne community member Kassem S.(kassem_s94) has reported that username handling in Revive Adserver was still vulnerable to impersonation attacks after the fix for CVE-2025-52672, via several alternate techniques. Homoglyphs based impersonation has been independently reported by other HackerOne users, such as itz_hari_ and khoof.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "HackerOne community member Kassem S.(kassem_s94) has reported that username handling in Revive Adserver was still vulnerable to impersonation attacks after the fix for CVE-2025-52672, via several alternate techniques. Homoglyphs based impersonation has been independently reported by other HackerOne users, such as itz_hari_ and khoof."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-55129",
"lastModified": "2025-12-02T19:15:50.060",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 2.5,
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-12-02T02:15:46.987",
"references": [
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3434156"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-176"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…