FKIE_CVE-2025-56761

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-09-03 17:15 - Updated: 2025-09-09 18:27
Severity ?
5.4 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
Memos 0.22 is vulnerable to Stored Cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities by the upload attachment and user avatar features. Memos does not verify the content type of the uploaded data and serve it back as is. An authenticated attacker can use this to elevate their privileges when the stored XSS is viewed by an admin.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/usememos/memos/blob/v0.24.0/server/router/api/v1/user_service.go#L147Product
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/usememos/memos/blob/v0.24.4/server/router/api/v1/resource_service.go#L48Product
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.sonarsource.com/blog/securing-go-applications-with-sonarqube-real-world-examples/Exploit, Patch, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
usememos memos 0.22.0
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:usememos:memos:0.22.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9CFC03E9-665F-4F88-B62E-ADBA5EA7F444",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Memos 0.22 is vulnerable to Stored Cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities by the upload attachment and user avatar features. Memos does not verify the content type of the uploaded data and serve it back as is. An authenticated attacker can use this to elevate their privileges when the stored XSS is viewed by an admin."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-56761",
  "lastModified": "2025-09-09T18:27:28.537",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.4,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
        "impactScore": 2.7,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-09-03T17:15:34.410",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/usememos/memos/blob/v0.24.0/server/router/api/v1/user_service.go#L147"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/usememos/memos/blob/v0.24.4/server/router/api/v1/resource_service.go#L48"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Patch",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.sonarsource.com/blog/securing-go-applications-with-sonarqube-real-world-examples/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-79"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.