FKIE_CVE-2025-60876

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-11-10 20:15 - Updated: 2025-11-12 21:15
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
BusyBox wget thru 1.3.7 accepted raw CR (0x0D)/LF (0x0A) and other C0 control bytes in the HTTP request-target (path/query), allowing the request line to be split and attacker-controlled headers to be injected. To preserve the HTTP/1.1 request-line shape METHOD SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1, a raw space (0x20) in the request-target must also be rejected (clients should use %20).
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://gist.github.com/subyumatest/41554af6a72aedaacaec026adc311092
cve@mitre.orghttps://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20250823/ccdc96ef/attachment-0001.htm
cve@mitre.orghttps://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20250828/e7f90492/attachment.htm
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "BusyBox wget thru 1.3.7 accepted raw CR (0x0D)/LF (0x0A) and other C0 control bytes in the HTTP request-target (path/query), allowing the request line to be split and attacker-controlled headers to be injected. To preserve the HTTP/1.1 request-line shape METHOD SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1, a raw space (0x20) in the request-target must also be rejected (clients should use %20)."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "BusyBox wget hasta la versi\u00f3n 1.3.7 aceptaba CR (0x0D)/LF (0x0A) sin procesar y otros bytes de control C0 en el *request-target* HTTP (ruta/consulta), lo que permit\u00eda dividir la l\u00ednea de solicitud e inyectar encabezados controlados por el atacante. Para preservar la forma de la l\u00ednea de solicitud HTTP/1.1 *M\u00c9TODO SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1*, un espacio sin procesar (0x20) en el *request-target* tambi\u00e9n debe ser rechazado (los clientes deben usar %20)."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-60876",
  "lastModified": "2025-11-12T21:15:50.993",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-11-10T20:15:48.683",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/subyumatest/41554af6a72aedaacaec026adc311092"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20250823/ccdc96ef/attachment-0001.htm"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20250828/e7f90492/attachment.htm"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Undergoing Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-284"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.