FKIE_CVE-2025-6380

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-07-24 10:15 - Updated: 2025-07-25 15:29
Severity ?
Summary
The ONLYOFFICE Docs plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to missing authorization within its oo.callback REST endpoint in versions 1.1.0 to 2.2.0. The plugin’s permission callback only verifies that the supplied, encrypted attachment ID maps to an existing attachment post, but does not verify the requester’s identity or capabilities. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as an arbitrary user.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The ONLYOFFICE Docs plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to missing authorization within its oo.callback REST endpoint in versions 1.1.0 to 2.2.0. The plugin\u2019s permission callback only verifies that the supplied, encrypted attachment ID maps to an existing attachment post, but does not verify the requester\u2019s identity or capabilities. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as an arbitrary user."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento ONLYOFFICE Docs para WordPress es vulnerable a la escalada de privilegios debido a la falta de autorizaci\u00f3n en su endpoint REST oo.callback en las versiones 1.1.0 a 2.2.0. La devoluci\u00f3n de llamada de permisos del complemento solo verifica que el ID de adjunto cifrado proporcionado se asigne a una publicaci\u00f3n de adjunto existente, pero no verifica la identidad ni las capacidades del solicitante. Esto permite que atacantes no autenticados inicien sesi\u00f3n como un usuario arbitrario."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-6380",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-25T15:29:19.837",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-24T10:15:26.973",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/onlyoffice/tags/2.2.0/public/class-onlyoffice-plugin-public.php#L111"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/onlyoffice/tags/2.2.0/public/views/class-onlyoffice-plugin-callback.php#L57"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/onlyoffice/#developers"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/608b0506-074b-4df3-8c30-57cfb090f553?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…