FKIE_CVE-2025-6515

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-10-20 17:15 - Updated: 2026-10-08 22:10
Summary
The MCP SSE endpoint in oatpp-mcp returns an instance pointer as the session ID, which is not unique nor cryptographically secure. This allows network attackers with access to the oatpp-mcp server to guess future session IDs and hijack legitimate client MCP sessions, returning malicious responses from the oatpp-mcp server.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "oatpp-mcp",
          "vendor": "oatpp",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "cpe"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "reefs@jfrog.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The MCP SSE endpoint in oatpp-mcp returns an instance pointer as the session ID, which is not unique nor cryptographically secure. This allows network attackers with access to the oatpp-mcp server to guess future session IDs and hijack legitimate client MCP sessions, returning malicious responses from the oatpp-mcp server."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El endpoint MCP SSE en oatpp-mcp devuelve un puntero de instancia como el ID de sesi\u00f3n, el cual no es \u00fanico ni criptogr\u00e1ficamente seguro. Esto permite a atacantes de red con acceso al servidor oatpp-mcp adivinar futuros ID de sesi\u00f3n y secuestrar sesiones MCP de clientes leg\u00edtimos, devolviendo respuestas maliciosas desde el servidor oatpp-mcp."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-6515",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-08T22:10:00.563",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 6.8,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "reefs@jfrog.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-6515",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-10-20T16:33:42.234883Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-10-20T17:15:39.197",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "reefs@jfrog.com",
      "url": "https://research.jfrog.com/vulnerabilities/oatpp-mcp-prompt-hijacking-jfsa-2025-001494691/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "reefs@jfrog.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-330"
        }
      ],
      "source": "reefs@jfrog.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…