FKIE_CVE-2025-68375
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-12-24 11:16 - Updated: 2025-12-24 11:16
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/x86: Fix NULL event access and potential PEBS record loss
When intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl() is called to drain PEBS records, the
perf_event_overflow() could be called to process the last PEBS record.
While perf_event_overflow() could trigger the interrupt throttle and
stop all events of the group, like what the below call-chain shows.
perf_event_overflow()
-> __perf_event_overflow()
->__perf_event_account_interrupt()
-> perf_event_throttle_group()
-> perf_event_throttle()
-> event->pmu->stop()
-> x86_pmu_stop()
The side effect of stopping the events is that all corresponding event
pointers in cpuc->events[] array are cleared to NULL.
Assume there are two PEBS events (event a and event b) in a group. When
intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl() calls perf_event_overflow() to process the
last PEBS record of PEBS event a, interrupt throttle is triggered and
all pointers of event a and event b are cleared to NULL. Then
intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl() tries to process the last PEBS record of
event b and encounters NULL pointer access.
To avoid this issue, move cpuc->events[] clearing from x86_pmu_stop()
to x86_pmu_del(). It's safe since cpuc->active_mask or
cpuc->pebs_enabled is always checked before access the event pointer
from cpuc->events[].
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf/x86: Fix NULL event access and potential PEBS record loss\n\nWhen intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl() is called to drain PEBS records, the\nperf_event_overflow() could be called to process the last PEBS record.\n\nWhile perf_event_overflow() could trigger the interrupt throttle and\nstop all events of the group, like what the below call-chain shows.\n\nperf_event_overflow()\n -\u003e __perf_event_overflow()\n -\u003e__perf_event_account_interrupt()\n -\u003e perf_event_throttle_group()\n -\u003e perf_event_throttle()\n -\u003e event-\u003epmu-\u003estop()\n -\u003e x86_pmu_stop()\n\nThe side effect of stopping the events is that all corresponding event\npointers in cpuc-\u003eevents[] array are cleared to NULL.\n\nAssume there are two PEBS events (event a and event b) in a group. When\nintel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl() calls perf_event_overflow() to process the\nlast PEBS record of PEBS event a, interrupt throttle is triggered and\nall pointers of event a and event b are cleared to NULL. Then\nintel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl() tries to process the last PEBS record of\nevent b and encounters NULL pointer access.\n\nTo avoid this issue, move cpuc-\u003eevents[] clearing from x86_pmu_stop()\nto x86_pmu_del(). It\u0027s safe since cpuc-\u003eactive_mask or\ncpuc-\u003epebs_enabled is always checked before access the event pointer\nfrom cpuc-\u003eevents[]."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-68375",
"lastModified": "2025-12-24T11:16:01.097",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2025-12-24T11:16:01.097",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b089028bff1f2ff9e0c62b8f1faca1a620e5d6e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e772a93eb61cb6265bdd1c5bde17d0f2718b452"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cf69b99805c263117305ac6dffbc85aaf9259d32"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…