FKIE_CVE-2025-68637

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-07 12:17 - Updated: 2026-01-16 14:34
Severity
9.1 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Summary
The Uniffle HTTP client is configured to trust all SSL certificates and disables hostname verification by default. This insecure configuration exposes all REST API communication between the Uniffle CLI/client and the Uniffle Coordinator service to potential Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks. This issue affects all versions from before 0.10.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.10.0, which fixes the issue.
References
security@apache.orghttps://lists.apache.org/thread/trvdd11hmpbjno3t8rc9okr4t036ox2vMailing List, Vendor Advisory, Issue Tracking
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/12/27/2Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
apache uniffle *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:uniffle:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "67EB1D78-AD8A-4795-95D5-ED54F7B0514C",
              "versionEndExcluding": "0.10.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Uniffle HTTP client is configured to trust all SSL certificates and\n\ndisables hostname verification by default. This insecure configuration\nexposes all REST API communication between the Uniffle CLI/client and the\nUniffle Coordinator service to potential Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks.\n\n\nThis issue affects all versions from before 0.10.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.10.0, which fixes the issue."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-68637",
  "lastModified": "2026-01-16T14:34:16.267",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 9.1,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-01-07T12:17:05.860",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Vendor Advisory",
        "Issue Tracking"
      ],
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/trvdd11hmpbjno3t8rc9okr4t036ox2v"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/12/27/2"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-297"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.