FKIE_CVE-2025-69606

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-01 18:16 - Updated: 2026-05-07 15:15
Severity
6.1 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was discovered in the GSVoIP web panel version 2.0.90. The `msg` parameter in the `/painel/gateways.php/error` endpoint does not properly sanitize user-supplied input, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the HTML response. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted URL to a victim, leading to unauthorized script execution, session hijacking, phishing, or other client-side attacks.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/Razielx64/CVE-2025-69606-GSVoIP-XSS
cve@mitre.orghttps://sip2.solutionsvoip.com.br/painel/gateways.php/error?msg=%3C%2Fscript%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert%28document.domain%29%3C%2Fscript%3E
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.solutionsvoip.com.br/
134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0https://github.com/Razielx64/CVE-2025-69606-GSVoIP-XSS
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was discovered in the GSVoIP web panel version 2.0.90. The `msg` parameter in the `/painel/gateways.php/error` endpoint does not properly sanitize user-supplied input, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the HTML response. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted URL to a victim, leading to unauthorized script execution, session hijacking, phishing, or other client-side attacks."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-69606",
  "lastModified": "2026-05-07T15:15:06.770",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.1,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 2.7,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-01T18:16:13.607",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://github.com/Razielx64/CVE-2025-69606-GSVoIP-XSS"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://sip2.solutionsvoip.com.br/painel/gateways.php/error?msg=%3C%2Fscript%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert%28document.domain%29%3C%2Fscript%3E"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.solutionsvoip.com.br/"
    },
    {
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "url": "https://github.com/Razielx64/CVE-2025-69606-GSVoIP-XSS"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-79"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.