GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2025-70043

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-23 16:29 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:03
Summary
An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in Ayms node-To master. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in TLS socket options
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in Ayms node-To master. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting \u0027rejectUnauthorized\u0027: false in TLS socket options"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Un problema relacionado con CWE-295: Validaci\u00f3n Incorrecta de Certificados fue descubierto en Ayms node-To master. La aplicaci\u00f3n deshabilita la validaci\u00f3n de certificados TLS/SSL al establecer \u0027rejectUnauthorized\u0027: false en las opciones de socket TLS."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-70043",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:03:03.860",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 9.1,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-70043",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-02-23T15:58:26.984168Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-02-23T16:29:36.093",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/zcxlighthouse/33cc4342dfe650664548b4531d16b655"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://github.com/Ayms"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://github.com/Ayms/node-To"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-295"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…