FKIE_CVE-2025-70994

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-04-23 15:36 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:03
Severity
7.3 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Summary
Yadea T5 Electric Bicycles (models manufactured in/after 2024) have a weak authentication mechanism in their keyless entry system. The system utilizes the EV1527 fixed-code RF protocol without implementing rolling codes or cryptographic challenge-response mechanisms. This is vulnerable to signal forgery after a local attacker intercepts any legitimate key fob transmission, allowing for complete unauthorized vehicle operation via a replay attack.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/ktauchathuranga/CVE-2025-70994
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/ktauchathuranga/ghost-keys
134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0https://github.com/ktauchathuranga/CVE-2025-70994
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Yadea T5 Electric Bicycles (models manufactured in/after 2024) have a weak authentication mechanism in their keyless entry system. The system utilizes the EV1527 fixed-code RF protocol without implementing rolling codes or cryptographic challenge-response mechanisms. This is vulnerable to signal forgery after a local attacker intercepts any legitimate key fob transmission, allowing for complete unauthorized vehicle operation via a replay attack."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-70994",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:03:30.723",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.3,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.1,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-70994",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "poc"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-04-23T15:09:43.949647Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-04-23T15:36:26.687",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://github.com/ktauchathuranga/CVE-2025-70994"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://github.com/ktauchathuranga/ghost-keys"
    },
    {
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "url": "https://github.com/ktauchathuranga/CVE-2025-70994"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-1390"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.