FKIE_CVE-2025-9086

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-09-12 06:15 - Updated: 2026-01-20 14:58
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
1. A cookie is set using the `secure` keyword for `https://target` 2. curl is redirected to or otherwise made to speak with `http://target` (same hostname, but using clear text HTTP) using the same cookie set 3. The same cookie name is set - but with just a slash as path (`path=\"/\",`). Since this site is not secure, the cookie *should* just be ignored. 4. A bug in the path comparison logic makes curl read outside a heap buffer boundary The bug either causes a crash or it potentially makes the comparison come to the wrong conclusion and lets the clear-text site override the contents of the secure cookie, contrary to expectations and depending on the memory contents immediately following the single-byte allocation that holds the path. The presumed and correct behavior would be to plainly ignore the second set of the cookie since it was already set as secure on a secure host so overriding it on an insecure host should not be okay.
References
2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2025-9086.htmlVendor Advisory, Patch
2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2025-9086.jsonVendor Advisory
2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9https://hackerone.com/reports/3294999Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/10/1Mailing List, Third Party Advisory, Patch
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/01/msg00002.htmlMailing List, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
haxx curl *
debian debian_linux 11.0
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:haxx:curl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4979D5F1-8D49-4EC0-AC6B-230636A10C34",
              "versionEndExcluding": "8.16.0",
              "versionStartIncluding": "8.13.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "FA6FEEC2-9F11-4643-8827-749718254FED",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "1. A cookie is set using the `secure` keyword for `https://target` \n 2. curl is redirected to or otherwise made to speak with `http://target` (same \n   hostname, but using clear text HTTP) using the same cookie set \n 3. The same cookie name is set - but with just a slash as path (`path=\\\"/\\\",`).\n   Since this site is not secure, the cookie *should* just be ignored.\n4. A bug in the path comparison logic makes curl read outside a heap buffer\n   boundary\n\nThe bug either causes a crash or it potentially makes the comparison come to\nthe wrong conclusion and lets the clear-text site override the contents of the\nsecure cookie, contrary to expectations and depending on the memory contents\nimmediately following the single-byte allocation that holds the path.\n\nThe presumed and correct behavior would be to plainly ignore the second set of\nthe cookie since it was already set as secure on a secure host so overriding\nit on an insecure host should not be okay."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-9086",
  "lastModified": "2026-01-20T14:58:01.347",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-09-12T06:15:44.100",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory",
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2025-9086.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2025-9086.json"
    },
    {
      "source": "2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3294999"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory",
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/10/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/01/msg00002.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "2499f714-1537-4658-8207-48ae4bb9eae9",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-125"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.