FKIE_CVE-2025-9633

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-09-11 08:15 - Updated: 2025-09-11 17:14
Severity ?
4.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
The LH Signing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.83. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/lh-signing/trunk/lh-signing.php#L1870
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/lh-signing/trunk/lh-signing.php#L1886
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/lh-signing/trunk/partials/option-settings.php#L3
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/fadd7934-bdd9-47e9-bd34-d162ff3b7cd4?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The LH Signing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.83. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-9633",
  "lastModified": "2025-09-11T17:14:10.147",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-09-11T08:15:38.360",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/lh-signing/trunk/lh-signing.php#L1870"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/lh-signing/trunk/lh-signing.php#L1886"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/lh-signing/trunk/partials/option-settings.php#L3"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/fadd7934-bdd9-47e9-bd34-d162ff3b7cd4?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.