FKIE_CVE-2026-11525

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-17 18:17 - Updated: 2026-06-17 20:20
Severity
3.7 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
Impact: When undici parses a Set-Cookie header, it accepts any SameSite attribute value that contains Strict, Lax, or None as a substring, rather than the case-insensitive exact match specified by RFC 6265. Non-spec values are silently mapped to one of the three standard tokens. For example, SameSite=NoneOfYourBusiness is parsed as None (the most permissive setting), and SameSite=StrictLax is parsed as Lax (a downgrade from Strict). Affected applications are those that consume Set-Cookie headers from server responses (for example via undici's fetch or proxy code paths) and then forward or rely on the parsed sameSite attribute. A malicious or non-compliant server can coerce the consumer's view of a cookie's SameSite policy to a weaker value, silently degrading the SameSite enforcement the cookie is supposed to provide. This was introduced in undici 5.15.0 when the cookies feature was added. Patches: Upgrade to undici v6.26.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. Workarounds: After parsing a Set-Cookie header, validate that the resulting sameSite attribute is one of 'Strict', 'Lax', or 'None' (exact, case-insensitive) before forwarding or relying on it.
References
ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bbhttps://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html
ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bbhttps://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-g8m3-5g58-fq7m
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageURL": "pkg:npm/undici",
          "product": "undici",
          "vendor": "undici",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "6.26.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.26.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "7.28.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.28.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "8.5.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "8.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Impact:\nWhen undici parses a Set-Cookie header, it accepts any SameSite attribute value that contains Strict, Lax, or None as a substring, rather than the case-insensitive exact match specified by RFC 6265. Non-spec values are silently mapped to one of the three standard tokens. For example, SameSite=NoneOfYourBusiness is parsed as None (the most permissive setting), and SameSite=StrictLax is parsed as Lax (a downgrade from Strict).\n\nAffected applications are those that consume Set-Cookie headers from server responses (for example via undici\u0027s fetch or proxy code paths) and then forward or rely on the parsed sameSite attribute. A malicious or non-compliant server can coerce the consumer\u0027s view of a cookie\u0027s SameSite policy to a weaker value, silently degrading the SameSite enforcement the cookie is supposed to provide.\n\nThis was introduced in undici 5.15.0 when the cookies feature was added.\n\nPatches:\nUpgrade to undici v6.26.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\nAfter parsing a Set-Cookie header, validate that the resulting sameSite attribute is one of \u0027Strict\u0027, \u0027Lax\u0027, or \u0027None\u0027 (exact, case-insensitive) before forwarding or relying on it."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-11525",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T20:20:10.920",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 3.7,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-11525",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-06-17T17:53:40.763762Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-06-17T18:17:35.097",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-g8m3-5g58-fq7m"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-183"
        }
      ],
      "source": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.