FKIE_CVE-2026-11576

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-19 10:16 - Updated: 2026-06-19 10:16
Summary
The security fix for CVE-2025-0728 in eclipse-threadx NetX Duo refactors error handling in the HTTP server PUT process to use a shared cleanup label, but this unified cleanup path unconditionally calls fx_file_close() even when the file was never successfully opened. Multiple error branches jump to the shared cleanup label before any file open operation has occurred, causing fx_file_close() to operate on an uninitialized file handle, leading to undefined behavior, double-close issues, or memory corruption.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Eclipse ThreadX - NetX Duo",
          "repo": "https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/netxduo",
          "vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.0.202601",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.4.2",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "emo@eclipse.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The security fix for CVE-2025-0728 in eclipse-threadx NetX Duo refactors error handling in the HTTP server PUT process to use a shared cleanup label, but this unified cleanup path unconditionally calls\u00a0fx_file_close()\u00a0even when the file was never successfully opened. Multiple error branches jump to the shared cleanup label before any file open operation has occurred, causing\u00a0fx_file_close()\u00a0to operate on an uninitialized file handle, leading to undefined behavior, double-close issues, or memory corruption."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-11576",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-19T10:16:09.743",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "emo@eclipse.org",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-06-19T10:16:09.743",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "emo@eclipse.org",
      "url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/123"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "emo@eclipse.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-415"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-459"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-908"
        }
      ],
      "source": "emo@eclipse.org",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…