FKIE_CVE-2026-19442

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-20 22:17 - Updated: 2026-08-21 11:17
Summary
IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 has a pointer validation flaw exists in the AIX Virtual SCSI (vSCSI) initiator driver. Successful exploitation may result in denial of service, privilege escalation, or full compromise of the client LPAR kernel.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:aix:7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:aix:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:aix:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:aix:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "product": "AIX",
          "vendor": "IBM",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.2"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.3"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:powervm_vios:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:powervm_vios:4.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "product": "PowerVM VIOS",
          "vendor": "IBM",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 has a pointer validation flaw exists in the AIX Virtual SCSI (vSCSI) initiator driver. Successful exploitation may result in denial of service, privilege escalation, or full compromise of the client LPAR kernel."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-19442",
  "lastModified": "2026-08-21T11:17:05.620",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.2,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.5,
        "impactScore": 6.0,
        "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-19442",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-08-21T10:56:30.587463Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-08-20T22:17:18.110",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283858"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-822"
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…