FKIE_CVE-2026-23117
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-14 15:16 - Updated: 2026-02-18 17:52
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: add missing ice_deinit_hw() in devlink reinit path
devlink-reload results in ice_init_hw failed error, and then removing
the ice driver causes a NULL pointer dereference.
[ +0.102213] ice 0000:ca:00.0: ice_init_hw failed: -16
...
[ +0.000001] Call Trace:
[ +0.000003] <TASK>
[ +0.000006] ice_unload+0x8f/0x100 [ice]
[ +0.000081] ice_remove+0xba/0x300 [ice]
Commit 1390b8b3d2be ("ice: remove duplicate call to ice_deinit_hw() on
error paths") removed ice_deinit_hw() from ice_deinit_dev(). As a result
ice_devlink_reinit_down() no longer calls ice_deinit_hw(), but
ice_devlink_reinit_up() still calls ice_init_hw(). Since the control
queues are not uninitialized, ice_init_hw() fails with -EBUSY.
Add ice_deinit_hw() to ice_devlink_reinit_down() to correspond with
ice_init_hw() in ice_devlink_reinit_up().
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nice: add missing ice_deinit_hw() in devlink reinit path\n\ndevlink-reload results in ice_init_hw failed error, and then removing\nthe ice driver causes a NULL pointer dereference.\n\n[ +0.102213] ice 0000:ca:00.0: ice_init_hw failed: -16\n...\n[ +0.000001] Call Trace:\n[ +0.000003] \u003cTASK\u003e\n[ +0.000006] ice_unload+0x8f/0x100 [ice]\n[ +0.000081] ice_remove+0xba/0x300 [ice]\n\nCommit 1390b8b3d2be (\"ice: remove duplicate call to ice_deinit_hw() on\nerror paths\") removed ice_deinit_hw() from ice_deinit_dev(). As a result\nice_devlink_reinit_down() no longer calls ice_deinit_hw(), but\nice_devlink_reinit_up() still calls ice_init_hw(). Since the control\nqueues are not uninitialized, ice_init_hw() fails with -EBUSY.\n\nAdd ice_deinit_hw() to ice_devlink_reinit_down() to correspond with\nice_init_hw() in ice_devlink_reinit_up()."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\nice: a\u00f1adir la llamada faltante a ice_deinit_hw() en la ruta de reinicio de devlink\n\ndevlink-reload resulta en un error de fallo de ice_init_hw, y luego la eliminaci\u00f3n del controlador ice causa una desreferencia de puntero NULL.\n\n[ +0.102213] ice 0000:ca:00.0: ice_init_hw fall\u00f3: -16\n...\n[ +0.000001] Traza de Llamadas:\n[ +0.000003] \n[ +0.000006] ice_unload+0x8f/0x100 [ice]\n[ +0.000081] ice_remove+0xba/0x300 [ice]\n\nEl commit 1390b8b3d2be (\u0027ice: eliminar llamada duplicada a ice_deinit_hw() en rutas de error\u0027) elimin\u00f3 ice_deinit_hw() de ice_deinit_dev(). Como resultado, ice_devlink_reinit_down() ya no llama a ice_deinit_hw(), pero ice_devlink_reinit_up() todav\u00eda llama a ice_init_hw(). Dado que las colas de control no est\u00e1n desinicializadas, ice_init_hw() falla con -EBUSY.\n\nA\u00f1adir ice_deinit_hw() a ice_devlink_reinit_down() para corresponder con ice_init_hw() en ice_devlink_reinit_up()."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-23117",
"lastModified": "2026-02-18T17:52:44.520",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-02-14T15:16:06.830",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/42fb5f3deb582cb96440e4683745017dbabb83d6"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3d99e2fbf01446d31a0d0dfc46444e915a1f6d4"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…