FKIE_CVE-2026-23310

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-25 11:16 - Updated: 2026-05-28 14:20
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmit_hash_policy change when XDP is loaded bond_option_mode_set() already rejects mode changes that would make a loaded XDP program incompatible via bond_xdp_check(). However, bond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set() has no such guard. For 802.3ad and balance-xor modes, bond_xdp_check() returns false when xmit_hash_policy is vlan+srcmac, because the 802.1q payload is usually absent due to hardware offload. This means a user can: 1. Attach a native XDP program to a bond in 802.3ad/balance-xor mode with a compatible xmit_hash_policy (e.g. layer2+3). 2. Change xmit_hash_policy to vlan+srcmac while XDP remains loaded. This leaves bond->xdp_prog set but bond_xdp_check() now returning false for the same device. When the bond is later destroyed, dev_xdp_uninstall() calls bond_xdp_set(dev, NULL, NULL) to remove the program, which hits the bond_xdp_check() guard and returns -EOPNOTSUPP, triggering: WARN_ON(dev_xdp_install(dev, mode, bpf_op, NULL, 0, NULL)) Fix this by rejecting xmit_hash_policy changes to vlan+srcmac when an XDP program is loaded on a bond in 802.3ad or balance-xor mode. commit 39a0876d595b ("net, bonding: Disallow vlan+srcmac with XDP") introduced bond_xdp_check() which returns false for 802.3ad/balance-xor modes when xmit_hash_policy is vlan+srcmac. The check was wired into bond_xdp_set() to reject XDP attachment with an incompatible policy, but the symmetric path -- preventing xmit_hash_policy from being changed to an incompatible value after XDP is already loaded -- was left unguarded in bond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set(). Note: commit 094ee6017ea0 ("bonding: check xdp prog when set bond mode") later added a similar guard to bond_option_mode_set(), but bond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set() remained unprotected.
Impacted products

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E265D934-61CB-43A3-82C6-6D0F5B6DD9D1",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.130",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.15",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B3D12E00-E42D-4056-B354-BAD4903C03A5",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.77",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "A5E006E4-59C7-43C1-9231-62A72219F2BA",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.18.17",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "69245D10-0B71-485E-80C3-A64F077004D3",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.19.7",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf/bonding: reject vlan+srcmac xmit_hash_policy change when XDP is loaded\n\nbond_option_mode_set() already rejects mode changes that would make a\nloaded XDP program incompatible via bond_xdp_check().  However,\nbond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set() has no such guard.\n\nFor 802.3ad and balance-xor modes, bond_xdp_check() returns false when\nxmit_hash_policy is vlan+srcmac, because the 802.1q payload is usually\nabsent due to hardware offload.  This means a user can:\n\n1. Attach a native XDP program to a bond in 802.3ad/balance-xor mode\n   with a compatible xmit_hash_policy (e.g. layer2+3).\n2. Change xmit_hash_policy to vlan+srcmac while XDP remains loaded.\n\nThis leaves bond-\u003exdp_prog set but bond_xdp_check() now returning false\nfor the same device.  When the bond is later destroyed, dev_xdp_uninstall()\ncalls bond_xdp_set(dev, NULL, NULL) to remove the program, which hits\nthe bond_xdp_check() guard and returns -EOPNOTSUPP, triggering:\n\nWARN_ON(dev_xdp_install(dev, mode, bpf_op, NULL, 0, NULL))\n\nFix this by rejecting xmit_hash_policy changes to vlan+srcmac when an\nXDP program is loaded on a bond in 802.3ad or balance-xor mode.\n\ncommit 39a0876d595b (\"net, bonding: Disallow vlan+srcmac with XDP\")\nintroduced bond_xdp_check() which returns false for 802.3ad/balance-xor\nmodes when xmit_hash_policy is vlan+srcmac.  The check was wired into\nbond_xdp_set() to reject XDP attachment with an incompatible policy, but\nthe symmetric path -- preventing xmit_hash_policy from being changed to an\nincompatible value after XDP is already loaded -- was left unguarded in\nbond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set().\n\nNote:\ncommit 094ee6017ea0 (\"bonding: check xdp prog when set bond mode\")\nlater added a similar guard to bond_option_mode_set(), but\nbond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set() remained unprotected."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\nbpf/bonding: rechazar el cambio de pol\u00edtica de hash de transmisi\u00f3n (xmit_hash_policy) a vlan+srcmac cuando XDP est\u00e1 cargado\n\nbond_option_mode_set() ya rechaza los cambios de modo que har\u00edan incompatible un programa XDP cargado a trav\u00e9s de bond_xdp_check(). Sin embargo, bond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set() no tiene tal protecci\u00f3n.\n\nPara los modos 802.3ad y balance-xor, bond_xdp_check() devuelve falso cuando la pol\u00edtica de hash de transmisi\u00f3n (xmit_hash_policy) es vlan+srcmac, porque la carga \u00fatil 802.1q suele estar ausente debido a la descarga de hardware. Esto significa que un usuario puede:\n\n1. Adjuntar un programa XDP nativo a un bond en modo 802.3ad/balance-xor con una pol\u00edtica de hash de transmisi\u00f3n (xmit_hash_policy) compatible (por ejemplo, capa2+3).\n2. Cambiar la pol\u00edtica de hash de transmisi\u00f3n (xmit_hash_policy) a vlan+srcmac mientras XDP permanece cargado.\n\nEsto deja bond-\u0026gt;xdp_prog establecido, pero bond_xdp_check() ahora devuelve falso para el mismo dispositivo. Cuando el bond es destruido posteriormente, dev_xdp_uninstall() llama a bond_xdp_set(dev, NULL, NULL) para eliminar el programa, lo que activa la protecci\u00f3n de bond_xdp_check() y devuelve -EOPNOTSUPP, desencadenando:\n\nWARN_ON(dev_xdp_install(dev, mode, bpf_op, NULL, 0, NULL))\n\nSolucione esto rechazando los cambios de pol\u00edtica de hash de transmisi\u00f3n (xmit_hash_policy) a vlan+srcmac cuando un programa XDP est\u00e1 cargado en un bond en modo 802.3ad o balance-xor.\n\nEl commit 39a0876d595b (\u0027net, bonding: No permitir vlan+srcmac con XDP\u0027) introdujo bond_xdp_check() que devuelve falso para los modos 802.3ad/balance-xor cuando la pol\u00edtica de hash de transmisi\u00f3n (xmit_hash_policy) es vlan+srcmac. La verificaci\u00f3n se integr\u00f3 en bond_xdp_set() para rechazar la asociaci\u00f3n de XDP con una pol\u00edtica incompatible, pero la ruta sim\u00e9trica -- impidiendo que la pol\u00edtica de hash de transmisi\u00f3n (xmit_hash_policy) se cambie a un valor incompatible despu\u00e9s de que XDP ya est\u00e9 cargado -- se dej\u00f3 sin protecci\u00f3n en bond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set().\n\nNota:\nEl commit 094ee6017ea0 (\u0027bonding: verificar programa xdp al establecer modo de bond\u0027) a\u00f1adi\u00f3 posteriormente una protecci\u00f3n similar a bond_option_mode_set(), pero bond_option_xmit_hash_policy_set() permaneci\u00f3 sin protecci\u00f3n."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-23310",
  "lastModified": "2026-05-28T14:20:22.840",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-25T11:16:27.160",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ace8027e41f6f094ef6c1aca42d2ed6cd7af54e"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/479d589b40b836442bbdadc3fdb37f001bb67f26"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c262bd0e39320a6d6c8277cb8349ce21c01b8c1"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d36ad7e126c6a0c5f699583309ccc37e3a3263ea"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e85fa809e507b9d8eff4840888b8c727e4e8448c"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…