FKIE_CVE-2026-31466

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-04-22 14:16 - Updated: 2026-05-07 18:25
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: fix folio isn't locked in softleaf_to_folio() On arm64 server, we found folio that get from migration entry isn't locked in softleaf_to_folio(). This issue triggers when mTHP splitting and zap_nonpresent_ptes() races, and the root cause is lack of memory barrier in softleaf_to_folio(). The race is as follows: CPU0 CPU1 deferred_split_scan() zap_nonpresent_ptes() lock folio split_folio() unmap_folio() change ptes to migration entries __split_folio_to_order() softleaf_to_folio() set flags(including PG_locked) for tail pages folio = pfn_folio(softleaf_to_pfn(entry)) smp_wmb() VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(folio)) prep_compound_page() for tail pages In __split_folio_to_order(), smp_wmb() guarantees page flags of tail pages are visible before the tail page becomes non-compound. smp_wmb() should be paired with smp_rmb() in softleaf_to_folio(), which is missed. As a result, if zap_nonpresent_ptes() accesses migration entry that stores tail pfn, softleaf_to_folio() may see the updated compound_head of tail page before page->flags. This issue will trigger VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() in pfn_swap_entry_folio() because of the race between folio split and zap_nonpresent_ptes() leading to a folio incorrectly undergoing modification without a folio lock being held. This is a BUG_ON() before commit 93976a20345b ("mm: eliminate further swapops predicates"), which in merged in v6.19-rc1. To fix it, add missing smp_rmb() if the softleaf entry is migration entry in softleaf_to_folio() and softleaf_to_page(). [tujinjiang@huawei.com: update function name and comments]

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5817BDB6-4C64-4AB6-83FF-CC693A5E4906",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.10.253",
              "versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "20DDB3E9-AABF-4107-ADB0-5362AA067045",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.203",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E2DDDCA1-6DAB-4018-B920-8F045DDD8D3B",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.1.168",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F56F925B-BAF8-4F4B-B62F-1496AF19A307",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.134",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6EF80433-B33B-43C5-8E64-0FA7B8DCE1BC",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.81",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "ED39847A-3B46-4729-B7CA-B2C30B9FA8FE",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.18.21",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4CA2E747-A9EC-4518-9AA2-B4247FC748B7",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.19.11",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F666C8D8-6538-46D4-B318-87610DE64C34",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "02259FDA-961B-47BC-AE7F-93D7EC6E90C2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "58A9FEFF-C040-420D-8F0A-BFDAAA1DF258",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/huge_memory: fix folio isn\u0027t locked in softleaf_to_folio()\n\nOn arm64 server, we found folio that get from migration entry isn\u0027t locked\nin softleaf_to_folio().  This issue triggers when mTHP splitting and\nzap_nonpresent_ptes() races, and the root cause is lack of memory barrier\nin softleaf_to_folio().  The race is as follows:\n\n\tCPU0                                             CPU1\n\ndeferred_split_scan()                              zap_nonpresent_ptes()\n  lock folio\n  split_folio()\n    unmap_folio()\n      change ptes to migration entries\n    __split_folio_to_order()                         softleaf_to_folio()\n      set flags(including PG_locked) for tail pages    folio = pfn_folio(softleaf_to_pfn(entry))\n      smp_wmb()                                        VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(folio))\n      prep_compound_page() for tail pages\n\nIn __split_folio_to_order(), smp_wmb() guarantees page flags of tail pages\nare visible before the tail page becomes non-compound.  smp_wmb() should\nbe paired with smp_rmb() in softleaf_to_folio(), which is missed.  As a\nresult, if zap_nonpresent_ptes() accesses migration entry that stores tail\npfn, softleaf_to_folio() may see the updated compound_head of tail page\nbefore page-\u003eflags.\n\nThis issue will trigger VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() in pfn_swap_entry_folio()\nbecause of the race between folio split and zap_nonpresent_ptes()\nleading to a folio incorrectly undergoing modification without a folio\nlock being held.\n\nThis is a BUG_ON() before commit 93976a20345b (\"mm: eliminate further\nswapops predicates\"), which in merged in v6.19-rc1.\n\nTo fix it, add missing smp_rmb() if the softleaf entry is migration entry\nin softleaf_to_folio() and softleaf_to_page().\n\n[tujinjiang@huawei.com: update function name and comments]"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-31466",
  "lastModified": "2026-05-07T18:25:42.033",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 4.7,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-04-22T14:16:42.780",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/426ee10711586617da869c8bb798214965337617"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c5e7f0fcd592801c9cc18f29f80fbee84eb8669"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/722cfaf6b31d31123439e67b5deac6b1261a3dea"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ad1997b9bc8032603df8f091761114479285769"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ddcf4a245c1c5a91fdd9698757e3d95179ffe41"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8bfb8414e9f2ce6f5f2f0e3d0da52f2d132128e7"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b8c49ad888892ad7b77062b9c102b799a3e9b4f8"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1acf5887c2bbaf998dc3fe32c72b7a8b84a3ddd"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-362"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…