FKIE_CVE-2026-3641

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-21 04:17 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:43
Summary
The Appmax plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Input Validation in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to the plugin registering a public REST API webhook endpoint at /webhook-system without implementing webhook signature validation, secret verification, or any mechanism to authenticate that incoming webhook requests genuinely originate from the legitimate Appmax payment service. The plugin directly processes untrusted attacker-controlled input from the 'event' and 'data' parameters without verifying the webhook's authenticity. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to craft malicious webhook payloads that can modify the status of existing WooCommerce orders (e.g., changing them to processing, refunded, cancelled, or pending), create entirely new WooCommerce orders with arbitrary data, create new WooCommerce products with attacker-controlled names/descriptions/prices, and write arbitrary values to order post metadata by spoofing legitimate webhook events.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Appmax",
          "vendor": "appmaxplataforma",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.0.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Appmax plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Input Validation in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to the plugin registering a public REST API webhook endpoint at /webhook-system without implementing webhook signature validation, secret verification, or any mechanism to authenticate that incoming webhook requests genuinely originate from the legitimate Appmax payment service. The plugin directly processes untrusted attacker-controlled input from the \u0027event\u0027 and \u0027data\u0027 parameters without verifying the webhook\u0027s authenticity. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to craft malicious webhook payloads that can modify the status of existing WooCommerce orders (e.g., changing them to processing, refunded, cancelled, or pending), create entirely new WooCommerce orders with arbitrary data, create new WooCommerce products with attacker-controlled names/descriptions/prices, and write arbitrary values to order post metadata by spoofing legitimate webhook events."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin Appmax para WordPress es vulnerable a la Validaci\u00f3n de Entrada Inadecuada en todas las versiones hasta la 1.0.3, inclusive. Esto se debe a que el plugin registra un endpoint de webhook de API REST p\u00fablico en /webhook-system sin implementar validaci\u00f3n de firma de webhook, verificaci\u00f3n de secreto, o cualquier mecanismo para autenticar que las solicitudes de webhook entrantes provengan genuinamente del servicio de pago leg\u00edtimo de Appmax. El plugin procesa directamente entrada no confiable controlada por el atacante de los par\u00e1metros \u0027event\u0027 y \u0027data\u0027 sin verificar la autenticidad del webhook. Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados elaboren cargas \u00fatiles de webhook maliciosas que pueden modificar el estado de pedidos existentes de WooCommerce (por ejemplo, cambi\u00e1ndolos a en procesamiento, reembolsado, cancelado o pendiente), crear pedidos de WooCommerce completamente nuevos con datos arbitrarios, crear nuevos productos de WooCommerce con nombres/descripciones/precios controlados por el atacante, y escribir valores arbitrarios en los metadatos de publicaciones de pedidos suplantando eventos de webhook leg\u00edtimos."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-3641",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:43:54.613",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-3641",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-03-23T17:56:07.823644Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-21T04:17:31.773",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/appmax/tags/1.0.3/includes/core/class-appmax-payments-webhook.php#L18"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/appmax/tags/1.0.3/includes/core/class-appmax-payments-webhook.php#L28"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/appmax/tags/1.0.3/includes/webhooks/class-appmax-payments-webhook-events.php#L103"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/appmax/tags/1.0.3/includes/webhooks/types/class-appmax-payments-order-paid.php#L56"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/appmax/trunk/includes/core/class-appmax-payments-webhook.php#L18"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/appmax/trunk/includes/core/class-appmax-payments-webhook.php#L28"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/appmax/trunk/includes/webhooks/class-appmax-payments-webhook-events.php#L103"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/appmax/trunk/includes/webhooks/types/class-appmax-payments-order-paid.php#L56"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/6bf61bb7-f977-4afe-bb81-e6de12e00b03?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-20"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…