FKIE_CVE-2026-39831

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-22 04:16 - Updated: 2026-06-02 16:33
Summary
The Verify() method for FIDO/U2F security key types (sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256@openssh.com, sk-ssh-ed25519@openssh.com) did not check the User Presence flag. Signatures generated without physical touch were accepted, allowing unattended use of a hardware security key. To restore the previous behavior, return a "no-touch-required" extension in Permissions.Extensions from PublicKeyCallback.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
golang crypto *

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:golang:crypto:*:*:*:*:*:go:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D540395B-31B8-4B07-8F79-F5C631BBD5C8",
              "versionEndExcluding": "0.52.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Verify() method for FIDO/U2F security key types (sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256@openssh.com, sk-ssh-ed25519@openssh.com) did not check the User Presence flag. Signatures generated without physical touch were accepted, allowing unattended use of a hardware security key. To restore the previous behavior, return a \"no-touch-required\" extension in Permissions.Extensions from PublicKeyCallback."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-39831",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-02T16:33:18.693",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 9.1,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-22T04:16:22.553",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@golang.org",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking"
      ],
      "url": "https://go.dev/cl/781662"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@golang.org",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking"
      ],
      "url": "https://go.dev/issue/79566"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@golang.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/a082jnz-LvI"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@golang.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-5019"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@golang.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…