FKIE_CVE-2026-41232
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-04-23 05:16 - Updated: 2026-04-27 17:02
Severity
Summary
Froxlor is open source server administration software. Prior to version 2.3.6, in `EmailSender::add()`, the domain ownership validation for full email sender aliases uses the wrong array index when splitting the email address, passing the local part instead of the domain to `validateLocalDomainOwnership()`. This causes the ownership check to always pass for non-existent "domains," allowing any authenticated customer to add sender aliases for email addresses on domains belonging to other customers. Postfix's `sender_login_maps` then authorizes the attacker to send emails as those addresses. Version 2.3.6 fixes the issue.
References
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:froxlor:froxlor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9A9C896A-1305-4134-850E-4B44962A6C0A",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.3.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Froxlor is open source server administration software. Prior to version 2.3.6, in `EmailSender::add()`, the domain ownership validation for full email sender aliases uses the wrong array index when splitting the email address, passing the local part instead of the domain to `validateLocalDomainOwnership()`. This causes the ownership check to always pass for non-existent \"domains,\" allowing any authenticated customer to add sender aliases for email addresses on domains belonging to other customers. Postfix\u0027s `sender_login_maps` then authorizes the attacker to send emails as those addresses. Version 2.3.6 fixes the issue."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-41232",
"lastModified": "2026-04-27T17:02:02.877",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-04-23T05:16:05.333",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/commit/77d04badf549d5f8429828f0fbc69bc37a35e07a"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Release Notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/releases/tag/2.3.6"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Vendor Advisory",
"Mitigation"
],
"url": "https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/security/advisories/GHSA-vmjj-qr7v-pxm6"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Vendor Advisory",
"Mitigation"
],
"url": "https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/security/advisories/GHSA-vmjj-qr7v-pxm6"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…