FKIE_CVE-2026-42526
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-19 20:16 - Updated: 2026-07-24 09:10
Severity
Summary
In the AWS Secrets Manager and SSM Parameter Store secrets backends of `apache-airflow-providers-amazon` prior to 9.28.0, the team-scoping logic could resolve a `conn_id` containing a `/` (e.g. `"my_team/conn"`) to the same path as another team's team-scoped secret when the caller had no team context. A privileged caller without team context could therefore retrieve another team's secret by crafting a colliding `conn_id`. Fixed in 9.28.0 by switching the team-scope separator to `--` and rejecting team-shaped `conn_id`s when team context is absent. Affects the experimental multi-tenant teams feature only. Users are recommended to upgrade to `apache-airflow-providers-amazon` 9.28.0, which fixes the issue.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security@apache.org | https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/65703 | Issue Tracking, Patch | |
| security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread/0092sz5g520d3qqjb01wd61myqlgjtyn | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/19/36 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | apache-airflow-providers-amazon | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.python.org",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "apache-airflow-providers-amazon",
"product": "Apache Airflow Amazon provider",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.28.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apache-airflow-providers-amazon:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CC5DFF6C-DFC7-465A-80C6-108810DE093E",
"versionEndExcluding": "9.28.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the AWS Secrets Manager and SSM Parameter Store secrets backends of `apache-airflow-providers-amazon` prior to 9.28.0, the team-scoping logic could resolve a `conn_id` containing a `/` (e.g. `\"my_team/conn\"`) to the same path as another team\u0027s team-scoped secret when the caller had no team context. A privileged caller without team context could therefore retrieve another team\u0027s secret by crafting a colliding `conn_id`. Fixed in 9.28.0 by switching the team-scope separator to `--` and rejecting team-shaped `conn_id`s when team context is absent. Affects the experimental multi-tenant teams feature only. Users are recommended to upgrade to `apache-airflow-providers-amazon` 9.28.0, which fixes the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En los backends de secretos de AWS Secrets Manager y SSM Parameter Store de \u0027apache-airflow-providers-amazon\u0027 anteriores a la versi\u00f3n 9.28.0, la l\u00f3gica de alcance de equipo podr\u00eda resolver un \u0027conn_id\u0027 que contuviera un / (por ejemplo, my_team/conn ) a la misma ruta que un secreto con alcance de equipo de otro equipo cuando el llamador no ten\u00eda contexto de equipo. Un llamador privilegiado sin contexto de equipo podr\u00eda, por lo tanto, recuperar el secreto de otro equipo al crear un \u0027conn_id\u0027 en colisi\u00f3n. Corregido en la versi\u00f3n 9.28.0 al cambiar el separador de alcance de equipo a -- y rechazando los \u0027conn_id\u0027 con forma de equipo cuando el contexto de equipo est\u00e1 ausente. Afecta solo a la caracter\u00edstica experimental de equipos multi-inquilino. Se recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a \u0027apache-airflow-providers-amazon\u0027 9.28.0, que corrige el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-42526",
"lastModified": "2026-07-24T09:10:00.153",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42526",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-19T19:53:21.498429Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-05-19T20:16:19.163",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/65703"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/0092sz5g520d3qqjb01wd61myqlgjtyn"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/19/36"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…