FKIE_CVE-2026-44073

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-21 08:16 - Updated: 2026-07-23 16:10
Summary
Authentication modules in Netatalk 1.5.0 through 4.4.2 fail to check the return value of seteuid(), which may allow a remote authenticated attacker to retain elevated privileges under error conditions.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Netatalk",
          "vendor": "Netatalk",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "4.4.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "4.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Authentication modules in Netatalk 1.5.0 through 4.4.2 fail to check the return value of seteuid(), which may allow a remote authenticated attacker to retain elevated privileges under error conditions."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Los m\u00f3dulos de autenticaci\u00f3n en Netatalk 1.5.0 hasta 4.4.2 no verifican el valor de retorno de seteuid(), lo que puede permitir a un atacante remoto autenticado retener privilegios elevados bajo condiciones de error."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-44073",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-23T16:10:00.137",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 5.0,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
        "impactScore": 3.4,
        "source": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-44073",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-05-21T12:22:54.006379Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-21T08:16:22.913",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
      "url": "https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2026-44073"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-273"
        }
      ],
      "source": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…