FKIE_CVE-2026-46263
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-03 18:16 - Updated: 2026-06-05 07:16
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix out-of-bounds stream encoder index v3
eng_id can be negative and that stream_enc_regs[]
can be indexed out of bounds.
eng_id is used directly as an index into stream_enc_regs[], which has
only 5 entries. When eng_id is 5 (ENGINE_ID_DIGF) or negative, this can
access memory past the end of the array.
Add a bounds check using ARRAY_SIZE() before using eng_id as an index.
The unsigned cast also rejects negative values.
This avoids out-of-bounds access.
Fixes the below smatch error:
dcn*_resource.c: stream_encoder_create() may index
stream_enc_regs[eng_id] out of bounds (size 5).
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/resource/dcn351/dcn351_resource.c
1246 static struct stream_encoder *dcn35_stream_encoder_create(
1247 enum engine_id eng_id,
1248 struct dc_context *ctx)
1249 {
...
1255
1256 /* Mapping of VPG, AFMT, DME register blocks to DIO block instance */
1257 if (eng_id <= ENGINE_ID_DIGF) {
ENGINE_ID_DIGF is 5. should <= be <?
Unrelated but, ugh, why is Smatch saying that "eng_id" can be negative?
end_id is type signed long, but there are checks in the caller which prevent it from being negative.
1258 vpg_inst = eng_id;
1259 afmt_inst = eng_id;
1260 } else
1261 return NULL;
1262
...
1281
1282 dcn35_dio_stream_encoder_construct(enc1, ctx, ctx->dc_bios,
1283 eng_id, vpg, afmt,
--> 1284 &stream_enc_regs[eng_id],
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This stream_enc_regs[] array has 5 elements so we are one element beyond the end of the array.
...
1287 return &enc1->base;
1288 }
v2: use explicit bounds check as suggested by Roman/Dan; avoid unsigned int cast
v3: The compiler already knows how to compare the two values, so the
cast (int) is not needed. (Roman)
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix out-of-bounds stream encoder index v3\n\neng_id can be negative and that stream_enc_regs[]\ncan be indexed out of bounds.\n\neng_id is used directly as an index into stream_enc_regs[], which has\nonly 5 entries. When eng_id is 5 (ENGINE_ID_DIGF) or negative, this can\naccess memory past the end of the array.\n\nAdd a bounds check using ARRAY_SIZE() before using eng_id as an index.\nThe unsigned cast also rejects negative values.\n\nThis avoids out-of-bounds access.\n\nFixes the below smatch error:\ndcn*_resource.c: stream_encoder_create() may index\nstream_enc_regs[eng_id] out of bounds (size 5).\n\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/resource/dcn351/dcn351_resource.c\n 1246 static struct stream_encoder *dcn35_stream_encoder_create(\n 1247 enum engine_id eng_id,\n 1248 struct dc_context *ctx)\n 1249 {\n\n ...\n\n 1255\n 1256 /* Mapping of VPG, AFMT, DME register blocks to DIO block instance */\n 1257 if (eng_id \u003c= ENGINE_ID_DIGF) {\n\nENGINE_ID_DIGF is 5. should \u003c= be \u003c?\n\nUnrelated but, ugh, why is Smatch saying that \"eng_id\" can be negative?\nend_id is type signed long, but there are checks in the caller which prevent it from being negative.\n\n 1258 vpg_inst = eng_id;\n 1259 afmt_inst = eng_id;\n 1260 } else\n 1261 return NULL;\n 1262\n\n ...\n\n 1281\n 1282 dcn35_dio_stream_encoder_construct(enc1, ctx, ctx-\u003edc_bios,\n 1283 eng_id, vpg, afmt,\n--\u003e 1284 \u0026stream_enc_regs[eng_id],\n ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This stream_enc_regs[] array has 5 elements so we are one element beyond the end of the array.\n\n ...\n\n 1287 return \u0026enc1-\u003ebase;\n 1288 }\n\nv2: use explicit bounds check as suggested by Roman/Dan; avoid unsigned int cast\n\nv3: The compiler already knows how to compare the two values, so the\n cast (int) is not needed. (Roman)"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-46263",
"lastModified": "2026-06-05T07:16:31.790",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-03T18:16:27.743",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/263e28add4f4472cfa95150d218955d1945aa413"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29f3824b08a98d41ecbbfd33580630d7607f962e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/abde491143e4e12eecc41337910aace4e8d59603"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca3808d560ad946ab6d089fd1f5bee04b952ead4"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…