FKIE_CVE-2026-48131

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-26 14:16 - Updated: 2026-07-24 11:10
Summary
The VPN service may mishandle an unexpected IKE fragment value received on the IKE port 500/UDP during the early stage of a connection attempt. This can cause the service to terminate unexpectedly, resulting in denial of service (temporary disruption of VPN-related functionality).
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "Quantum Security Gateway",
          "vendor": "checkpoint",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 6 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 91 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 127 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All releases from R81.10 and below"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@checkpoint.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The VPN service may mishandle an unexpected IKE fragment value received on the IKE port 500/UDP during the early stage of a connection attempt. This can cause the service to terminate unexpectedly, resulting in denial of service (temporary disruption of VPN-related functionality)."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El servicio VPN puede manejar incorrectamente un valor de fragmento IKE inesperado recibido en el puerto IKE 500/UDP durante la etapa inicial de un intento de conexi\u00f3n. Esto puede provocar que el servicio finalice inesperadamente, lo que resulta en denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (interrupci\u00f3n temporal de la funcionalidad relacionada con la VPN)."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-48131",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-24T11:10:00.170",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "cve@checkpoint.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-48131",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-05-26T15:12:47.698813Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-26T14:16:38.407",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@checkpoint.com",
      "url": "https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk184981"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@checkpoint.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-122"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@checkpoint.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…