FKIE_CVE-2026-53624

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-08 20:16 - Updated: 2026-07-08 20:16
Severity
4.8 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.4.0, the helmet middleware in middleware/helmet/helmet.go never sets the Strict-Transport-Security response header even when HSTSMaxAge is configured because it checks c.Protocol() for https instead of c.Scheme(). This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/gofiber/fiber/commit/04dd4e7754f61768fddccacc79057e416f13e6bf
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/gofiber/fiber/pull/4389
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/gofiber/fiber/releases/tag/v3.4.0
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/gofiber/fiber/security/advisories/GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2c
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "fiber",
          "vendor": "gofiber",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 3.4.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.4.0, the helmet middleware in middleware/helmet/helmet.go never sets the Strict-Transport-Security response header even when HSTSMaxAge is configured because it checks c.Protocol() for https instead of c.Scheme(). This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-53624",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-08T20:16:52.293",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.8,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-07-08T20:16:52.293",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/commit/04dd4e7754f61768fddccacc79057e416f13e6bf"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/pull/4389"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/releases/tag/v3.4.0"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/security/advisories/GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2c"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-319"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.