FKIE_CVE-2026-72203
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-15 06:21 - Updated: 2026-08-19 08:17
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ntfs: skip extent mft records in writeback to prevent deadlock
This patch fixes the ABBA deadlock between extent_lock and extent
mrec_lock triggered by xfstests generic/113, that occurs since the commit
6994acf33bae ("ntfs: use base mft_no when looking up base inode for
extent record").
Path A (inode writeback):
VFS writeback
-> ntfs_write_inode()
-> __ntfs_write_inode()
-> mutex_lock(&ni->extent_lock)
-> mutex_lock(&tni->mrec_lock)
Path B (MFT folio writeback):
VFS writeback of $MFT dirty folios
-> ntfs_mft_writepages()
-> ntfs_write_mft_block()
-> ntfs_may_write_mft_record()
-> holds one extent mrec_lock from a previous iteration
-> tries to acquire another base inode extent_lock
By removing all extent_lock and extent mrec_lock acquisition from the MFT
folio writeback path, the ABBA lock ordering is eliminated:
Path A: __ntfs_write_inode(): extent_lock -> mrec_lock
Path B (removed): ntfs_write_mft_block(): mrec_lock -> extent_lock
Path B is always redundant for extent records because:
1. mark_mft_record_dirty(ext_ni) does NOT dirty the MFT folio.
It only sets NInoDirty(ext_ni) and marks the base VFS inode dirty
via __mark_inode_dirty(I_DIRTY_DATASYNC), which triggers Path A.
Therefore, normal extent modifications never create a situation where
the MFT folio is dirty and Path B is not scheduled.
2. The MFT folio only gets dirtied via ntfs_mft_mark_dirty() inside
ntfs_mft_record_alloc(). But all identified callers in attrib.c
(ntfs_attr_add, ntfs_attr_record_move_away,
ntfs_attr_make_non_resident, ntfs_attr_record_resize) follow through
with mark_mft_record_dirty(), which triggers Path A to write the
complete record.
3. ntfs_evict_big_inode() calls ntfs_commit_inode() before freeing extent
inodes, ensuring all dirty extents are flushed via Path A before the
base inode leaves the icache.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ntfs/mft.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7ffa8f3d30236e0ab897c30bdb01224ff1fe1c89",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f831ab09d521898bf1dd99bf5adfd630ea1428e3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1e9ea7e04472d4e5e12e58c881eaacfb3e49b669",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "76bc14c7097ff678b2b5dbfd4fa33b46897d87ce",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1e9ea7e04472d4e5e12e58c881eaacfb3e49b669",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ntfs/mft.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.12"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.1"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.12",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.1",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1.5",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nntfs: skip extent mft records in writeback to prevent deadlock\n\nThis patch fixes the ABBA deadlock between extent_lock and extent\nmrec_lock triggered by xfstests generic/113, that occurs since the commit\n6994acf33bae (\"ntfs: use base mft_no when looking up base inode for\n\t\textent record\").\n\nPath A (inode writeback):\n VFS writeback\n -\u003e ntfs_write_inode()\n -\u003e __ntfs_write_inode()\n -\u003e mutex_lock(\u0026ni-\u003eextent_lock)\n -\u003e mutex_lock(\u0026tni-\u003emrec_lock)\n\nPath B (MFT folio writeback):\n VFS writeback of $MFT dirty folios\n -\u003e ntfs_mft_writepages()\n -\u003e ntfs_write_mft_block()\n -\u003e ntfs_may_write_mft_record()\n -\u003e holds one extent mrec_lock from a previous iteration\n -\u003e tries to acquire another base inode extent_lock\n\nBy removing all extent_lock and extent mrec_lock acquisition from the MFT\nfolio writeback path, the ABBA lock ordering is eliminated:\n\nPath A: __ntfs_write_inode(): extent_lock -\u003e mrec_lock\nPath B (removed): ntfs_write_mft_block(): mrec_lock -\u003e extent_lock\n\nPath B is always redundant for extent records because:\n\n1. mark_mft_record_dirty(ext_ni) does NOT dirty the MFT folio.\n It only sets NInoDirty(ext_ni) and marks the base VFS inode dirty\n via __mark_inode_dirty(I_DIRTY_DATASYNC), which triggers Path A.\n Therefore, normal extent modifications never create a situation where\n the MFT folio is dirty and Path B is not scheduled.\n\n2. The MFT folio only gets dirtied via ntfs_mft_mark_dirty() inside\n ntfs_mft_record_alloc(). But all identified callers in attrib.c\n (ntfs_attr_add, ntfs_attr_record_move_away,\n ntfs_attr_make_non_resident, ntfs_attr_record_resize) follow through\n with mark_mft_record_dirty(), which triggers Path A to write the\n complete record.\n\n3. ntfs_evict_big_inode() calls ntfs_commit_inode() before freeing extent\n inodes, ensuring all dirty extents are flushed via Path A before the\n base inode leaves the icache."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-72203",
"lastModified": "2026-08-19T08:17:13.473",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-15T06:21:38.970",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76bc14c7097ff678b2b5dbfd4fa33b46897d87ce"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ffa8f3d30236e0ab897c30bdb01224ff1fe1c89"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f831ab09d521898bf1dd99bf5adfd630ea1428e3"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…