FKIE_CVE-2026-72472
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-15 06:22 - Updated: 2026-08-17 06:19
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list
Lingfeng identified a bug and suggested two solutions, but both appear
to have issues.
Generally, we cannot release flc_lock while iterating over the file lock
list to avoid use-after-free (UAF) problems with file locks. However,
functions like nfs_delegation_claim_locks and nfs4_reclaim_locks cannot
adhere to this rule because recover_lock or nfs4_lock_delegation_recall
may take a long time. To resolve this, NFS switches to using nfsi->rwsem
for the same protection, and nfs_reclaim_locks follows this approach.
Although nfs_delegation_claim_locks uses so_delegreturn_mutex instead,
this is inadequate since a single inode can have multiple nfs4_state
instances. Therefore, the fix is to also use nfsi->rwsem in this case.
Furthermore, after commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range
lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), the functions
nfs4_locku_done and nfs4_lock_done also break this rule because they
call locks_lock_inode_wait without holding nfsi->rwsem. Simply adding
this protection could cause many deadlocks, so instead, the call to
locks_lock_inode_wait is moved into _nfs4_proc_setlk. Regarding the bug
fixed by commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range
lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), it has been resolved
after commit 0460253913e5 ("NFSv4: nfs4_do_open() is incorrectly triggering
state recovery") because all slots are drained before calling
nfs4_do_reclaim, which prevents concurrent stateid changes along this path.
Also, nfs_delegation_claim_locks does not cause this concurrency either
since when _nfs4_proc_setlk is called with NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, no RPC is
sent, so nfs4_lock_done is not called. Therefore,
nfs4_lock_delegation_recall from nfs_delegation_claim_locks is the first
time the stateid is set.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/delegation.c",
"fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c",
"include/linux/nfs_xdr.h"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1cda95bf2e9c0e6b63545b7565fe4a1e474322f4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c69899a17ca4836230720e65493942d9582a0424",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f161ef7b0dd2f51fdb002ba4a4e9bf0ee7409218",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c69899a17ca4836230720e65493942d9582a0424",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e68035178e65e2b3aa386ce61202ff33724ae418",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c69899a17ca4836230720e65493942d9582a0424",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4837fb36219e6c08b666bc31a86841bad8526358",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c69899a17ca4836230720e65493942d9582a0424",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/delegation.c",
"fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c",
"include/linux/nfs_xdr.h"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.0",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.97",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.40",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1.5",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfs: use nfsi-\u003erwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list\n\nLingfeng identified a bug and suggested two solutions, but both appear\nto have issues.\n\nGenerally, we cannot release flc_lock while iterating over the file lock\nlist to avoid use-after-free (UAF) problems with file locks. However,\nfunctions like nfs_delegation_claim_locks and nfs4_reclaim_locks cannot\nadhere to this rule because recover_lock or nfs4_lock_delegation_recall\nmay take a long time. To resolve this, NFS switches to using nfsi-\u003erwsem\nfor the same protection, and nfs_reclaim_locks follows this approach.\nAlthough nfs_delegation_claim_locks uses so_delegreturn_mutex instead,\nthis is inadequate since a single inode can have multiple nfs4_state\ninstances. Therefore, the fix is to also use nfsi-\u003erwsem in this case.\n\nFurthermore, after commit c69899a17ca4 (\"NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range\nlock must be atomic with the stateid update\"), the functions\nnfs4_locku_done and nfs4_lock_done also break this rule because they\ncall locks_lock_inode_wait without holding nfsi-\u003erwsem. Simply adding\nthis protection could cause many deadlocks, so instead, the call to\nlocks_lock_inode_wait is moved into _nfs4_proc_setlk. Regarding the bug\nfixed by commit c69899a17ca4 (\"NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range\nlock must be atomic with the stateid update\"), it has been resolved\nafter commit 0460253913e5 (\"NFSv4: nfs4_do_open() is incorrectly triggering\nstate recovery\") because all slots are drained before calling\nnfs4_do_reclaim, which prevents concurrent stateid changes along this path.\nAlso, nfs_delegation_claim_locks does not cause this concurrency either\nsince when _nfs4_proc_setlk is called with NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, no RPC is\nsent, so nfs4_lock_done is not called. Therefore,\nnfs4_lock_delegation_recall from nfs_delegation_claim_locks is the first\ntime the stateid is set."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-72472",
"lastModified": "2026-08-17T06:19:15.137",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-15T06:22:21.313",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cda95bf2e9c0e6b63545b7565fe4a1e474322f4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4837fb36219e6c08b666bc31a86841bad8526358"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e68035178e65e2b3aa386ce61202ff33724ae418"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f161ef7b0dd2f51fdb002ba4a4e9bf0ee7409218"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…