FKIE_CVE-2026-98065
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-25 11:17 - Updated: 2026-09-25 11:17
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Reject key-less BTF for hash maps
map_check_btf() allows a key-less BTF (btf_key_type_id == 0) only for
maps that have a ->map_check_btf callback, and leaves the actual
decision to that callback. Hash maps used to have no ->map_check_btf,
so a key-less BTF was rejected outright.
That changed when htab and rhtab gained a ->map_check_btf to register a
dtor - htab in commit 1df97a7453ee ("bpf: Register dtor for freeing
special fields") and rhtab in commit 6905f8601298 ("bpf: Allow special
fields in resizable hashtab"). Neither looks at the key, so a key-less
hash map now passes map_check_btf() and gets created. Reading it back
through bpffs feeds the key type_id 0 into btf_type_seq_show();
btf_type_by_id() returns the void type, kind_ops[BTF_KIND_UNKN] is NULL,
and btf_type_show() dereferences it:
RIP: 0010:btf_type_show+0x223/0x2e0 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8232
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000399f868 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000028
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffffc9000399f970 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff9b96b140
R13: ffffc9000399f8e0 R14: ffff88803d393c00 R15: 0000000000000003
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000200000000000 CR3: 000000003d213000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000039ae8f55 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
btf_type_seq_show_flags+0xca/0x120 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8250
htab_map_seq_show_elem+0x12e/0x350 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1669
map_seq_show+0x13d/0x1e0 kernel/bpf/inode.c:293
traverse.part.0.constprop.0+0x107/0x650 fs/seq_file.c:112
traverse fs/seq_file.c:99 [inline]
seq_read_iter+0x93f/0x1270 fs/seq_file.c:196
seq_read+0x344/0x4d0 fs/seq_file.c:163
vfs_read+0x1e4/0xb40 fs/read_write.c:572
ksys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:764 [inline]
__do_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:772 [inline]
__se_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:769 [inline]
__x64_sys_pread64+0x1eb/0x250 fs/read_write.c:769
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Reject a key-less BTF in htab_map_check_btf() and rhtab_map_check_btf(),
restoring the previous behavior.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/bpf/hashtab.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7ca231252820c47aaec42a5db580db98f9b64724",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1df97a7453eec80c1912c2d0360290a3970a7671",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0895a0c0734703be5532f3883c42db95615fd98b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1df97a7453eec80c1912c2d0360290a3970a7671",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/bpf/hashtab.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.0",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2.7",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.3-rc2",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Reject key-less BTF for hash maps\n\nmap_check_btf() allows a key-less BTF (btf_key_type_id == 0) only for\nmaps that have a -\u003emap_check_btf callback, and leaves the actual\ndecision to that callback. Hash maps used to have no -\u003emap_check_btf,\nso a key-less BTF was rejected outright.\n\nThat changed when htab and rhtab gained a -\u003emap_check_btf to register a\ndtor - htab in commit 1df97a7453ee (\"bpf: Register dtor for freeing\nspecial fields\") and rhtab in commit 6905f8601298 (\"bpf: Allow special\nfields in resizable hashtab\"). Neither looks at the key, so a key-less\nhash map now passes map_check_btf() and gets created. Reading it back\nthrough bpffs feeds the key type_id 0 into btf_type_seq_show();\nbtf_type_by_id() returns the void type, kind_ops[BTF_KIND_UNKN] is NULL,\nand btf_type_show() dereferences it:\n\nRIP: 0010:btf_type_show+0x223/0x2e0 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8232\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000399f868 EFLAGS: 00010206\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000028\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffffc9000399f970 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff9b96b140\nR13: ffffc9000399f8e0 R14: ffff88803d393c00 R15: 0000000000000003\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000200000000000 CR3: 000000003d213000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0\nDR0: 0000000039ae8f55 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n btf_type_seq_show_flags+0xca/0x120 kernel/bpf/btf.c:8250\n htab_map_seq_show_elem+0x12e/0x350 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1669\n map_seq_show+0x13d/0x1e0 kernel/bpf/inode.c:293\n traverse.part.0.constprop.0+0x107/0x650 fs/seq_file.c:112\n traverse fs/seq_file.c:99 [inline]\n seq_read_iter+0x93f/0x1270 fs/seq_file.c:196\n seq_read+0x344/0x4d0 fs/seq_file.c:163\n vfs_read+0x1e4/0xb40 fs/read_write.c:572\n ksys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:764 [inline]\n __do_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:772 [inline]\n __se_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:769 [inline]\n __x64_sys_pread64+0x1eb/0x250 fs/read_write.c:769\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nReject a key-less BTF in htab_map_check_btf() and rhtab_map_check_btf(),\nrestoring the previous behavior."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-98065",
"lastModified": "2026-09-25T11:17:35.553",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-09-25T11:17:35.553",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0895a0c0734703be5532f3883c42db95615fd98b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca231252820c47aaec42a5db580db98f9b64724"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…