FKIE_CVE-2026-98372

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-10-06 09:18 - Updated: 2026-10-06 09:18
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: iptfs: fix stack OOB read in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() advances to the fragment containing @offset with an unbounded loop: while (offset >= walk->past + walk->frags[walk->fragi].len) walk->past += walk->frags[walk->fragi++].len; walk->fragi is advanced and walk->frags[walk->fragi] is dereferenced without ever checking fragi against walk->nr_frags. When the requested offset is at or beyond the total length spanned by the walk's fragments, fragi runs past nr_frags and off the end of the fixed-size on-stack frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1] array, reading out-of-bounds stack memory. The two callers behave differently: iptfs_skb_add_frags() already guards against this with if (!walk->nr_frags || offset >= walk->total + walk->initial_offset) return len; but iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() has no such guard and calls iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() unconditionally, so it performs the out-of-range walk. Its own "fragi < walk->nr_frags" bound check runs only afterwards, too late to prevent the read. This is reachable from the receive path: a crafted IP-TFS (AGGFRAG) payload delivered to an IPTFS SA drives iptfs_reassem_cont() -> iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() with an offset past the fragment total, e.g.: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888008ad7210 by task repro/345 iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:392 iptfs_skb_can_add_frags+0x155/0x310 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:420 iptfs_reassem_cont+0xcf8/0x1140 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:902 iptfs_input_ordered+0x552/0x670 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1280 iptfs_input+0x3d6/0xde0 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1741 xfrm_input+0x282f/0x6140 net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:700 xfrm4_esp_rcv+0x93/0x120 net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c:104 ip_rcv+0x278/0x2d0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:612 Give iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() the same up-front guard that iptfs_skb_add_frags() already has, so the walk is never entered with an out-of-range offset. When it triggers, the caller falls back to the existing linearize-and-copy path, which is safe.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7e1c6884a0b494b7e3f204877f94c1e07a117bf7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5f2b6a9095743a6bf1f34c43c4fe78fa8bdf5ad7",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "da56d0ee93d1bad779b0486f2fab92d1bc1f0cf3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5f2b6a9095743a6bf1f34c43c4fe78fa8bdf5ad7",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "d042487dc118e494db2e2c1382310255c90ff544",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5f2b6a9095743a6bf1f34c43c4fe78fa8bdf5ad7",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.14"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "6.14",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.18.54",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.2.8",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.3-rc4",
              "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfrm: iptfs: fix stack OOB read in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk()\n\niptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() advances to the fragment containing @offset\nwith an unbounded loop:\n\n\twhile (offset \u003e= walk-\u003epast + walk-\u003efrags[walk-\u003efragi].len)\n\t\twalk-\u003epast += walk-\u003efrags[walk-\u003efragi++].len;\n\nwalk-\u003efragi is advanced and walk-\u003efrags[walk-\u003efragi] is dereferenced\nwithout ever checking fragi against walk-\u003enr_frags. When the requested\noffset is at or beyond the total length spanned by the walk\u0027s fragments,\nfragi runs past nr_frags and off the end of the fixed-size on-stack\nfrags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1] array, reading out-of-bounds stack memory.\n\nThe two callers behave differently: iptfs_skb_add_frags() already guards\nagainst this with\n\n\tif (!walk-\u003enr_frags ||\n\t    offset \u003e= walk-\u003etotal + walk-\u003einitial_offset)\n\t\treturn len;\n\nbut iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() has no such guard and calls\niptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() unconditionally, so it performs the\nout-of-range walk. Its own \"fragi \u003c walk-\u003enr_frags\" bound check runs only\nafterwards, too late to prevent the read.\n\nThis is reachable from the receive path: a crafted IP-TFS (AGGFRAG)\npayload delivered to an IPTFS SA drives iptfs_reassem_cont() -\u003e\niptfs_skb_can_add_frags() with an offset past the fragment total, e.g.:\n\n  BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250\n  Read of size 4 at addr ffff888008ad7210 by task repro/345\n   iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:392\n   iptfs_skb_can_add_frags+0x155/0x310  net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:420\n   iptfs_reassem_cont+0xcf8/0x1140      net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:902\n   iptfs_input_ordered+0x552/0x670      net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1280\n   iptfs_input+0x3d6/0xde0              net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1741\n   xfrm_input+0x282f/0x6140             net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:700\n   xfrm4_esp_rcv+0x93/0x120             net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c:104\n   ip_rcv+0x278/0x2d0                   net/ipv4/ip_input.c:612\n\nGive iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() the same up-front guard that\niptfs_skb_add_frags() already has, so the walk is never entered with an\nout-of-range offset. When it triggers, the caller falls back to the\nexisting linearize-and-copy path, which is safe."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-98372",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-06T09:18:31.743",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2026-10-06T09:18:31.743",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e1c6884a0b494b7e3f204877f94c1e07a117bf7"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d042487dc118e494db2e2c1382310255c90ff544"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da56d0ee93d1bad779b0486f2fab92d1bc1f0cf3"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Received"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…