GCVE-1-2026-0018
Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-02-27 13:25 – Updated: 2026-02-27 13:25
VLAI?
Title
Improper access control in MISP user contact form allows cross-organisation email targeting
Summary
A flaw in the admin_email() action allowed a non–site-admin user to submit the contact/email form in a way that bypassed intended organisation restrictions. The server-side logic did not sufficiently verify that the recipient organisation provided in the request was one the user was authorized to target. As a result, an authenticated user could potentially send emails to users outside their own organisation by manipulating the recipient organisation selection (e.g., by tampering with request parameters).
Severity ?
CWE
Assigner
References
Credits
Maxime ESCOURBIAC from Michelin CERT
Sami Mokaddem (aka Graphman)
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "misp",
"vendor": "misp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.5.",
"status": "affected"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Maxime ESCOURBIAC from Michelin CERT"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Sami Mokaddem"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A flaw in the \u003ccode\u003eadmin_email()\u003c/code\u003e action allowed a non\u2013site-admin user to submit the contact/email form in a way that bypassed intended organisation restrictions. The server-side logic did not sufficiently verify that the recipient organisation provided in the request was one the user was authorized to target. As a result, an authenticated user could potentially send emails to users outside their own organisation by manipulating the recipient organisation selection (e.g., by tampering with request parameters)."
}
],
"value": "A flaw in the admin_email() action allowed a non\u2013site-admin user to submit the contact/email form in a way that bypassed intended organisation restrictions. The server-side logic did not sufficiently verify that the recipient organisation provided in the request was one the user was authorized to target. As a result, an authenticated user could potentially send emails to users outside their own organisation by manipulating the recipient organisation selection (e.g., by tampering with request parameters)."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/c7c11678dcb4f7040d3dab1f7af6b011fc3fd568"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Improper access control in MISP user contact form allows cross-organisation email targeting",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"datePublished": "2026-02-27T13:25:32.632362Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-27T13:25:32.632362Z",
"requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-0018",
"vulnerabilitylookup_history": [
[
"alexandre.dulaunoy@circl.lu",
"2026-02-27T13:25:32.632362Z"
]
]
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…