GHSA-22Q9-7CMF-JJXP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:39 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:39
VLAI?
Details

The LDAP component in Fedora Directory Server 1.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a certain "bad BER sequence" that results in a free of uninitialized memory, as demonstrated using the ProtoVer LDAP test suite.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-0453"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-02-14T22:06:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The LDAP component in Fedora Directory Server 1.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a certain \"bad BER sequence\" that results in a free of uninitialized memory, as demonstrated using the ProtoVer LDAP test suite.",
  "id": "GHSA-22q9-7cmf-jjxp",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T06:39:59Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T06:39:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0453"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24795"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179135"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18960"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16677"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…