GHSA-2357-2QJP-RWFG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:11 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:11
VLAI?
Details
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.1 through 7.1.1.8, and Maximo Asset Management 7.1 through 7.1.1.8 and 7.2 for Tivoli IT Asset Management for IT and certain other products, allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0104, CVE-2015-0107, and CVE-2015-0109.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-0108"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-02-18T02:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.1 through 7.1.1.8, and Maximo Asset Management 7.1 through 7.1.1.8 and 7.2 for Tivoli IT Asset Management for IT and certain other products, allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0104, CVE-2015-0107, and CVE-2015-0109.",
"id": "GHSA-2357-2qjp-rwfg",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:11:39Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:11:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0108"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/99605"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21694974"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…